Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Wormshill

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was promoted 01:51, 21 January 2008.

Wormshill[edit]

Nomination restarted (old nom) Raul654 (talk) 22:37, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support, per my comments in the previous nomination. Mike Christie (talk) 22:41, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Epbr123 (talk) 22:45, 7 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This is about the best article I've ever seen about a very small village. --Malleus Fatuorum (talk) 00:06, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I did the GA review and I'm blown away at the rate and quality of work that has been done to this article. No issues. -- Jza84 · (talk) 00:55, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Excellent article, well organized and well written. Cla68 (talk) 07:26, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support all my previous comments were addressed. DrKiernan (talk) 08:25, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - all previous concerns have been accepted and taken. Meets FAC criteria in my opinion. Rudget . 17:05, 8 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -nice prose and comprehensive. cheers, Casliber (talk · contribs) 12:22, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - My concerns from the previous FAC have been dealt with. Lurker (said · done) 17:57, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work. An excellent article. LordHarris 20:03, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - This has come to together very well. maclean 23:38, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I'm amazed how much this has improved during its featured-article candidacy. Bluap (talk) 00:11, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Why was this restarted? Tony (talk) 14:04, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support -can't see anything to fix Jimfbleak (talk) 16:33, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.