Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Tiger/archive1

Tiger[edit]

Nominator(s): Bastian (talk) 03:24, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured article because it is a very well-written, well researched, stable, completely objective and neutral, and well sourced/referenced article which deserves to be a featured article. Bastian (talk) 03:24, 25 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: Please fix all the tags in the article that include dead link, verification needed, Citation needed, specify etc. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk 17:25, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This FAC was not trancluded at WT:FAC-- there is quite a bit of uncited text, and the article would be better suited for peer review. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 18:41, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No response in two days although nominator is actively posting: removing FAC template from talk page, notifying nominator. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:54, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]