Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Squid Game/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The article was archived by Ian Rose via FACBot (talk) 8 November 2021 [1].

Squid Game[edit]

Nominator(s): Leomk0403 (talk) 03:02, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This article is about...

Oppose and suggest closure on the following grounds:

The nominator has never edited the article and I can't see a talk page discussion for where other editors agreed that this is ready for a FAC (I note that the nominator has only been active on Wikipedia for a few weeks, so they might be unfamiliar with expectations around the FA process)
The article is being frequently edited so probably isn't stable
As this is about a TV series that became available and wildly popular only in the last few weeks, this feels premature.
The text is flabby and filled with trivia and way too many quotes from people associated with the series. Nick-D (talk) 07:36, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Strongly oppose:

This isn't even a good article yet and it also does not have a single peer review.
There is nobody on the talk page who has even raised that this article is ready for a FAC.
This article is way too messy and not concise enough. Also adding on, this article has only existed for less than 3 months (although FA articles can technically be nominated at any time, this is quite premature.)

Sorry, but no, this article is nowhere close enough to even be considered for a FAC let alone a GA nomination. Jeuno (talk) (contribs) 09:15, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Ian Rose (talk) 08:16, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.