Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/My Chemical Romance/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured article nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The article was not promoted by User:GrahamColm 13:59, 6 February 2013 [1].
My Chemical Romance[edit]
- Nominator(s): Eric - Contact me please. I prefer conversations started on my talk page if the subject is changed 20:22, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I am nominating this for featured article because is well cited, well written, feature-worthy and meets criteria. Eric - Contact me please. I prefer conversations started on my talk page if the subject is changed 20:22, 3 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Quick fail
- Too short lead.
- Several uncited sentences.
- Dead links in the references.
- With a grand total of six edits, nominator is not the primary contributor to the article.
- Unbalanced coverage: there's more about some tabloid incident than their musical style.
- POV worries: there's a section called Controversy.
This article is a solid B, definitely not GA-worthy, leave alone FA.—indopug (talk) 13:02, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as above. Review should be closed. A long way from FA status, and would certainly benefit from work before going to GAC, though perhaps that is within reach. I agree with the above comments, and particularly echo the unbalanced coverage concerns. There are even citation needed tags in the article. J Milburn (talk) 23:13, 4 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Simply not good enough at this point. There are entire parts of the article (like the "Controversy" section) that have barely any reliable sources cited, are completely irrelevant, and don't reflect anything besides how a few fans of the band feel. Friginator (talk) 22:00, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FAC/ar, and leave the {{featured article candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Graham Colm (talk) 18:57, 6 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.