Wikipedia:Articles for improvement/Nominations/Archives/2024/3

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


CityFibre[edit]

CityFibre – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 100 daily hits

  • A fast growing independent British network provider, providing gigabit-capable FTTP broadband across the UK. It is the third-largest network provider in the UK, after Openreach and Virgin Media. Ive identified this page as needing improvements (talk) as alot of history and activity is missing. TagKnife (talk) 02:10, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, an important company in need of expansion. SVcode(Talk) 14:52, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support - per nom.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:58, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - per nom.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 05:12, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 00:19, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Drinking water[edit]

Drinking water – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 753 daily hits

  • Although some of the talk page ratings assess this article as B class, it is very poorly organized and I am inclined to disagree with that assessment. It's clearly an important subject, so cleaning up some of the endless lists of examples and statistics is a good idea. Many sections clearly overlap with other articles, which isn't bad, but moving some information to other articles might also be helpful for concision. Toadspike (talk) 12:40, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support as per nom Wil540 art (talk) 05:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Neutral Article looks good but I only skimmed it. It could possible need some more help. SVcode(Talk) 23:04, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose Article seems fine. Equalwidth (C) 09:48, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support - per nom.BabbaQ (talk) 09:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Support although I could see this being expanded as much as or more than it's trimmed/cleaned. This is a very important topic for the whole planet, and I can see fresh eyes helping to better balance international coverage and reconsidering some of its organization. It gives a feel of oversummarizing in some places, like it's there just to act like a portal. Stefen Towers among the rest! Gab • Gruntwerk 01:55, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  6. Support per nom.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 05:11, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 00:20, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adana[edit]

Adana – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 480 daily hits

  • Adana is one of the biggest cities in Turkey. It carries major historical importance. Adana should be made into at least a B-class article. Also, I'm suprised that Adana is rated Mid importance on the Turkish WikiProject when I think it deserves High impotance. Youprayteas (talk) 09:42, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Oppose, article looks good. SVcode(Talk) 19:09, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Oppose - for now. Per above.--BabbaQ (talk) 14:59, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Oppose per above.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 05:09, 27 February 2024 (UTC)]][reply]

no Not approvedSVcode(Talk) 00:11, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Judgement[edit]

Judgement – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 189 daily hits

  • I've seen that this article has a high amount of views in the past 30 days, at about 5,853 in the past 30 days as of this section being made. The last edit was about a month ago, and I believe if actions to editing were more frequent (which I believe would be simple and easy), this article could be much more. It is on an important topic and would greatly help.
    valerie frostcrush (talkpage) 20:42, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, important article in dire need of help. SVcode(Talk) 22:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 05:08, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support, per above. Zanahary (talk) 06:55, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  4. Support - needs projects help.BabbaQ (talk) 00:34, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Approved SVcode(Talk) 00:12, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Commander[edit]

Commander – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 437 daily hits

  • Important article that needs more citations. SVcode(Talk) 23:41, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support, good candidate for AFI. Wil540 art (talk) 00:38, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support, per above.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 05:07, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support - needs projects help.BabbaQ (talk) 00:35, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ApprovedSVcode(Talk) 00:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Strike action[edit]

Strike action – (page view stats • edit • talk • history) - 445 daily hits

  • Important article that's a vital article with high hits in need of our help. SVcode(Talk) 23:03, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  1. Support - Looks good to go. And project can definitely help. agree with nom.BabbaQ (talk) 07:59, 26 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Support per nom. Utopes (talk / cont) 22:33, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  3. Support per nom.GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 05:06, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Approved SVcode(Talk) 00:13, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_improvement/Nominations/Archives/2024/3&oldid=1213294114"