Wikipedia:AMA Requests for Assistance/Requests/November 2006/Nobs02/Evidence

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wikipedia:Arbitration policy/Precedents#Dispute resolution

Statement of principle
  • users who are in conflict talk to one another on their respective talk pages and on the talk page of any article in dispute.
Cases involving this principle

29 July[edit]

  • 20:14

31 July[edit]

  • 20:43
    • nobs posts on Cberlet's talk page
      • Dear Sir: I approached you in good faith; please direct any personal sentiments regarding my postings or others to my Talk page. [2]
  • 20:45
    • Cberlet responds
      • I have no interest in a side conversation. [3]

3 August[edit]

  • 19:42
    • Cberlet again responds
      • Please carry out all contact with me through the talk pages of specific articles. I have no interest in continuing to engage with you outside the actual editing process. Messages left here will not be responded to. [4]
  • 20:12
    • Cberlet's first RfM; refers to nobs gesture of good faith and application of dispute resolution precedents as
      • harrassment [5]

Illustrations of dispute[edit]

Direct examples of improper and invalid methodology to affect POV.


22 August 2005

22 August 2005

22 August 2005

16 September 2005

  • 01:42
    • In a subhead entitled ==Nobs has once again misrepresented sources in his espionage paragraphs== Cberlet charges nobs with "misrepresentation", "inaccurate", "biased", and "false"; Cberlet extracts,
      • " 'The following were members of the Victor Perlo Network'; That statement is not qualified as 'According to Elizabeth Bentley', or 'Elizabeth Bentley has alleged', etc."; says " this is a misrepresentation. " [9]

30 September


nobs 17:46, 3 October 2005 (UTC) nobs 05:33, 4 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]


from Internet Wayback Machine

17 December[edit]

  • 21:59
    • personal attack by User:Cberlet on nobs via edit summary [11]; nobs response,
      • This is an outlandish misrepresentation of a personal attack via edit summary. The financial report clearly uses the word, sales. [12] The website clearly uses the words sale of materials. [13].