User talk:ZombieHorrorMovie13

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natzee Zombie Carnage (film) (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hewhoamareismyself was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Natzee Zombie Carnage (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Natzee Zombie Carnage (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

hewhoamareismyself 06:15, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello, ZombieHorrorMovie13! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! hewhoamareismyself 06:15, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Night of the Zombies

Plot descriptions cannot be copied from other sources, including official sources and IMDb, unless these can be verified to be public domain or licensed compatibly with Wikipedia. They must be written in original language to comply with Wikipedia's copyright policy. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:28, 3 December 2019 (UTC)

Okay, I will go back and reword it in my own words, based on the VHS packaging and IMDB information. I will try to work on it to make it more in compliance. -ZombieHorrorMovie13 (12/3/2019) I went back and reworded everything to make it more original language. -ZombieHorrorMovie13 (12/3/2019)

Nomination of Horrors of War (film) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Horrors of War (film) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horrors of War (film) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:57, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Reverted the article to the way it was before it was nominated to be deleted. Everything was just fine with the article, and it shouldn't be deleted. ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 15:14, 27 December 2019 (UTC)

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Horrors of War (film). Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 00:39, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

I am not trying to remove anything. I was undoing edits that were efforts to remove information about the movie. I am trying to be constructive and improve the overall quality of the article about this notable Nazi Zombie horror film. It is an important film in the genre. How am I suppost to work on improving the article when you keep trying to delete all the information? You are the one in the wrong here. I am trying to go along with the rules and discuss things on the talk pages. I kept stating to not delete information. I stated to post your issues on the article's talk page instead of deleting relevant information. ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk —Preceding undated comment added 00:50, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:HorrorsOfWar2006.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:HorrorsOfWar2006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

The "Horrors of War" movie poster will probably just be deleted. Some evil people already deleted the whole article, instead of working on it to make it better. Tough trying to be a positive good person, when the world is full of negative A-Holes. -ZombieHorrorMovie13 (01/04/2020)

Speedy deletion of Horrors of War (film)

If this was the first article that you created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

The page Horrors of War (film) has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appeared to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Horrors of War (film). When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, or you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Yunshui ^雲_水 23:42, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

I just tried fixing the article to make it better, but some people are just evil and try to delete everything. An uphill losing battle. Really sad to see how evil people win sometimes in this world. -ZombieHorrorMovie13

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Wolfenstein3DMutantZombie.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Wolfenstein3DMutantZombie.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Natzee Zombie Carnage (film) (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Missvain was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Natzee Zombie Carnage (film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Natzee Zombie Carnage (film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Missvain (talk) 22:41, 10 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Jojo Rabbit, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. Categories must also be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Geraldo Perez (talk) 16:59, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

The final scene that Hitler appears in the film, had him undead with a gunshot wound to the head. In that scene Hitler appears as an undead zombie. That scene makes Jojo Rabbit technically a Nazi Zombie movie. That is the truth. Addiing the Category for "Nazi Zombie Movies", was technically correct. ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 10:10, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

No it isn't. It is not mentioned in the article at all and this is not what the film is about. See WP:CATVER and WP:NOTDEFINING. Geraldo Perez (talk) 17:17, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

In the article, " A disheveled Adolf (now displaying a severe head wound) angrily confronts Jojo for siding with Elsa, and Jojo kicks him out the window.". That is a scene after Jojo has been told that Hitler blew his brains out in the film. Hitler having the severe head wound is from having killed himself. He appears as an undead zombie. It doen't matter that you don't thiink that is the point of the film. Having an undead Hitler technically makes it a Nazi Zombie film. Just like They Saved Hitler's Brain from 1968 is a Nazi Zombie film.ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 10:26, 19 March 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. I am not vandalizing, I've added sources and am talking on the talk page. I don't appreciate you referring to me as a vandal in each edit summary. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:33, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Wikipedia. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:13, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

2nd notice

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Please note, I have discussed it on the talk page. You haven't responded there. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:16, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

The person that added the Template didn't know what they were doing, they made mistakes. A List Article doesn't need sourcing. They were also guilty of attempting to do vandalism to the article. ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 09:21, 17 April 2020

Have you read WP:RS and WP:SOURCELIST? WP:SOURCELIST specifically states "Therefore, all individual items on the list must follow Wikipedia's content policies: the core content policies of Verifiability (through good sources in the item's one or more references), No original research, and Neutral point of view, plus the other content policies as well. Although the format of a list might require less detail per topic, Wikipedia policies and procedures apply equally to both a list of similar things as well as to any related article to which an individual thing on the list might be linked." Asking for sources is actually very much the part of rules for lists. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:26, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

You changed the opening of the article to, "Nazi zombies are a small theme of horror films." That is not correct. It goes beyond being a "small theme". It also has to do with Video Games, and Comic Books. You were simply doing vandalism by trying to delete information. The article is written from a Neutral point of view. It has information about the horror trope that is found in films, video games, and comic books. You however seem to be just another vandal, trying to butcher everything. And, yes I have read WP:RS and WP:SOURCELIST? WP:SOURCELIST. I am following the rules for a "List Article". Please learn what the hell you are doing, and stop trying to do vandalism. ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 09:32, 17 April 2020

I stated that because that's what a reliable source stated. Wikipedia is about venerability and not about publishing original research. I've specifically shown you the rules on what the lists are, but you have not shown me how I'm breaking the rules or how your content follows the rules (which, as I've posted, seems to be breaking them). Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:37, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

You refuse to admit that you attempted to do vandalism to the opening of the article that was already written from a Neutral point of view. You attempted to delete how the Horror trope has to do with comic books, and video games. You also attempted to have a bias point of view by saying it was, "a small theme of horror films.", when it has to do with more than just horror films. And, again, this is a List Article. It lists all Nazi Zombie related Movies, Video Games, and printed materials. This is a List Article, and doesn't not need to be sources. You seem to not know what the hell you are talking about. You are just trying to do vandalism to the article, and butcher it in general. ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 09:44, 17 April 2020

April 2020

Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries. Your edit summary may have been removed. Please look at pages regarding Civility and Personal attacks in your spare time. Thank you. I would appreciate you not calling me a vandal in each edit. Its not a standard rule, but perhaps read WP:ATWV Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:07, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

All I did was tell the truth. I was trying to be a good person and add information to the page. You were the bad person trying to vandalize the article by deleting relevant information. The Truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God.ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2020

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The discussion is about the topic Nazi zombies. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! — TransporterMan (TALK) 18:14, 17 April 2020 (UTC) (DRN Volunteer) (Not watching this page)

I try my best to add information to the list article "Nazi zombies". It lists the Films & Television, Video Games, and Books & Other, sources of Nazi Zombie related materials. I have tried my best to make it a better, more complete list. Other people keep coming along to vandalize the page, and delete relevant information. It is so hard to try and make a single article better when others just try to keep tearing down my efforts. I have tried to do non bias contributions, and list all the relevant information in the list of "Nazi Zombie" horror pop culture sources. Someone even tried to claim a copyright issue on the image of a "Nazi Zombie" that was shown on the article. I was 100% the creator of that image. There was no copyright violation, but the image was deleted anyways. I made a Nazi Zombie horror movie. I was just trying to make the article better by listing all the Movies, Video Games, and Comic Books that relate to Nazi Zombies. To make it a better list article.ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 14:34, 18 April 2020

April 2020

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Don't Play No Game I Can't Win, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Per WP:YOUTUBE and WP:RS and WP:OR. you need sources for genre in music articles and we don't use youtube as a source in articles like this. Andrzejbanas (talk) 09:06, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Again, Bad People came along and deleted a good article, "Don't Play No Game I Can't Win" was a good article, and A-Holes deleted it. ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 10:46, 19 April 2020

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use inappropriate or abusive edit summaries, you may be blocked from editing. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:53, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Please refrain from adding, removing or changing genres without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Pleaes do not add genres to a music article where there is no source. This is against WP:RS, WP:OR and WP:SUBJECTIVE. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:54, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Heads up

I've re-added the banner about the Nazi Zombie article being unsourced. Please read the links in it before removing it. I have not changed any content you wrote on the page, but I'd suggest we discuss the rules again before removing it. Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:36, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Okay, I left your Fascist "Rules-Nazi" needs sourcing banner. But, please just stop from deleting the relevant information to the article. I still feel that the Needs Sourcing banner is vandalism to the page. It is added to say that something is wrong with the article. Added by someone that isn't trying to make the article better. Added by someone that just wants to rub dirt onto the article instead of cleaning it up to make it shine. If you wanted to make it better, you should have instead have done your own research to add sourcing, that only you seemed to want in the first place. Instead, you just wanted to rub dirt onto the article to make it worse, by slapping your banner onto it. Anf, that isn't all you tried to do. You also tried to delete relevant information, besides adding the banner ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 13:22, 19 April 2020

April 2020

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from Nazi zombies. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please don't remove a banner until discussion on it has been done. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:25, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. I don't appreciate being called a fascist Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:28, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

I didn't do any attacks. All I did was tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help me God. ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 13:32, 19 April 2020.

Calling an editors actions as Fascist "Rules-Nazi" suggests othewise. If you disagree with an editors actions, that's fine. Calling them, or what they are doing what you did is not following Wikipedia's rules at Wikipedia:Civility. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:49, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Correct. And if I see you do so again, ZombieHorrorMovie13, I will block you.-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:52, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. , again, just re-adding genres without a source isn't helping anyone understand the music or find reliable sourced content for this article. Andrzejbanas (talk) 20:31, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

I am not trying to do "disruptive editing", as you say. I am trying to add information to articles. The so called "Disruptive Editind" is the deleation of relavent information from articles. That is what is really occurring here.ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 13:58, 19 April 2020

If you want to add or change article content, the burden is on you to provide sources meeting Wikipedia criteria to do so. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Using sources

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. . When combining sources as you did, you attributed bits of information that were not in the citations granted. Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:27, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

The sourcing you used was wrong. "Zombie Lake" and "Oasis of the Zombies" are not late 1970s films as your source says. They are films from the early 1980s. You used a source that had wrong information. I was trying to do a re-wright, with correct information. But you keep changing it to the wrong information from your source. How about you let me do a more correct re-wright, without deleting all the relavent information?ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 14:33, 19 April 2020

I've changed the article to reflect this by removing the 1970s bit. Although its not clear when these films were shot, it could be misleading to readers. If you want to attempt to re-write the article, be my guess but do not add original research. You previously added information and attributed to a source that said nothing what you were saying. If you can find sources, please be my guest.Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:39, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

You now have it poorly worded. There is "and the late European films", which makes no sense. All you are doing is butchering the article opening. You took out mention of Shockwaves 1977. It was better written mentioning, Exploitation Films, War Films, Wartime Propaganda, Now there is no mention of Hellboy, or Overlord, an the Resurrection of Adolf Hitler. Some movies in the genera deal with resurrecting Hitler. Jesus Christ is considered as "Zombie Jesus" by many. The same logic also applies to Resurrected Hitler, as "Zombie Hitler". You have deleted too much relavent information from the opening paragraph. You said, "Nazi zombies are a small theme of horror films", which might have been true in the 1970s, but now it is its own genera of Horror Movie. You used an outdated opinionated source. You have detracted from the quality of the opening of the article. I have attempted to go back and do a re-wright that is more correct, but now I seem to be blocked from editing a disputed opening to this article. I am just trying to make it better, and more correct. You on the other hand have used outdated incorrect sourced information. Just because it has sourcing, doesn't make it correct information. Can't you just fix it to have the correct information? ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 13:22, 19 April 2020

It was not better because it was WP:OR. If there is grammar issues such as my misreading or how you say re-wright instead of re-write, they should be fixed. If the sources are out of date, please update them, but the source is coming from a book that's from 2012. What has changed with the genre since then? I appreciate your efforts to clarify information, but you can't add original research. Please research how to find citations and apply them. I feel like I've said this for every response i've given to you and I feel like the only correct version you seem to have is your own opinion on what is or what isn't the genre. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:01, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

A quick follow-up, do not add films with the citation needed tag. If you are going to add new content, its up to you to find a source. Andrzejbanas (talk) 22:34, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

I am still trying to work on the article. Please stop deleting everything. The Article would be better to include links to the articles about "War Film", and "Exploitation Films". That way the reader looking at the article can have links to articles about those subjects, which Nazi Zombie films relate to. The WW2 period films were Wartime Propaganda films, and the latter films are Exploitation Films. Don't you want articles with relevant information included? Maybe not? You do seem to like deleting whatever you can, whenever you can.ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 15:37, 19 April 2020

I'm removing unsourced additions, which you have been added. Also again, don't remove tags until the situation is clear. you removed them saying that there was a list of these items, but those sections are unsourced as well. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:24, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

I was using reference sources in the intro re-write. I was complying with the sourcing requirement in the intro re-write.ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 16:25, 19 April 2020

I'm sorry, I don't know what you are saying here. Adding a sentence for one film doesn't really enhance the intro here. That's probably best included into citing the individual films. Andrzejbanas (talk) 23:26, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

Mentioning Overlord 2018 shows that the film genera still continues. That more modern films of this genera are still being made. It was a sourced reference, and you deleted it, even when it was sourced. When it was the way you wanted it to be in the first place. Nothing seems to be good enough for you, other than deleting whatever information you feel like deleting. Hard to write an article with substance when it is contently being censored. ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 16:25, 19 April 2020

Having a list of films that shows them being made is probably a better way of showing that it continues. We can't just list it all as prose. The lead should really give a breif overview of trends and what the genre is about. Your sentence I believe said "Overloard was another zombie nazi film in 2008" or something to that effect. You need better context for readers. I would suggest reading WP:AUDIENCE to get the idea. Again, do not be disheartned that i'm changing your content, i'm using your sources you have found (some of which are pretty good!). It's just that some of these would fit better in the list. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:43, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

I am going to just give up. I am quitting. The user, "Andrzejbanas", butchered the article I was working on. I was going to add more films, and video games, and printed materials to the list. The user, "Andrzejbanas", came along and deleted way too much relevant information to the subject matter in the article "Nazi zombies". He mixed up the order of the films, which had been ordered by release date. The whole article has been butchered by the user, "Andrzejbanas". I tried to fix it up, and improve the overall quality, but he kept combating my efforts. He kept trying to undermine everything, and succeed in butchering the article. I am now done with Wikipedia all together. I have given up. I will not try to add any more contributions to Human knowledge, when people like "Andrzejbanas" just want to censor, vandalize, and tear everything down. You win, small minded Fascist people. I have given up.ZombieHorrorMovie13 (talk) 15:48, 19 April 2020

• Two things, maybe three. First of all, fix that damn link to your talk page in your signature. Second, Andrzejbanas (and other editors who have sparred with you) have a much firmer grip on Wikipedia's guidelines and sourcing requirements than you seem to do. Third, if I see you calling others "small minded Fascist people" again (or any other insult), I will block you immediately and indefinitely, even if you hyphenate it correctly. Drmies (talk) 00:58, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

April 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use inappropriate or abusive edit summaries. Per your edit here. Andrzejbanas (talk) 00:40, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Draft:Natzee Zombie Carnage (film) concern

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Natzee Zombie Carnage (film), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:29, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Natzee Zombie Carnage

Hello, ZombieHorrorMovie13. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Natzee Zombie Carnage, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Natzee Zombie Carnage

Hello, ZombieHorrorMovie13. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Natzee Zombie Carnage".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:11, 1 May 2021 (UTC)