User talk:ZoeBrigleyThompson

Welcome![edit]

Hello, ZoeBrigleyThompson, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Feminism. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! — Bilorv_(c)(talk) 18:08, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Zoe, I'm pretty sure it was you who left a message on my talk today but it wasn't signed, so I apologize if it was someone else on the Feminist Poetry talkpage (I'm a little fuzzy on who can see what). I was trying to say that yes, I think you should leave the stubs in the page, though I would consider organizing all of the national sections under regional headings so as to avoid the unevenness of having national and regional headings mixed and creating an unintentional hierarchy.Profm (talk) 17:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)profm[reply]

A cup of tea for you![edit]

Good job on the feminism edits! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:36, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One quick note - with sourcing, make sure that you're using the best possible sources and that all major claims are sourced. Good job overall! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 13:37, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Shalor (Wiki Ed) Message text. ZoeBrigleyThompson (talk) 15:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC) Thanks for the note, Shaylor. Which sources did you think might be problematic? Do I need to put a source after every sentence as I would in an academic essay, or can it just be at the end of the paragraph?[reply]

Hey Zoe, I've only had a chance to take quick look so far (will review further later). I know that you are concerned about the unevenness of the sections, but I really do not think it makes sense to build the sections you know best and put in placeholders so that others might be encouraged to build in what they know. I do think that if you are thinking about building sections regionally it might be an idea to shift "US" to "North American" with subheadings, switch "Cambodia" to "South East Asia" with national subheadings, etc. Just a thought. Profm (talk) 15:12, 19 September 2018 (UTC)profm[reply]