User talk:Zababba

Welcome!

Hello, Zababba, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Technopat (talk) 12:17, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, you may be blocked from editing. Technopat (talk) 10:48, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your note. Personal opinions like this cannot, and will not, be tolerated. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a forum or a blog. --Technopat (talk) 05:29, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Thank you for your note. Whatever bias the article may have will not be resolved by adding further bias, which is, unfortunately, exactly what your edit did (see above). In the welcome template above you can read about this in greater detail, but simplifying, Wikipedia is not interested in "The Truth", whatever that may be, but in what can be reliably sourced, that is, what other "reputable" sources have stated, which we can then add to an article, and providing the corresponding reference, not merely our own knowledge of the issue, and not removing exixting references. Regards, --Technopat (talk) 12:19, 26 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]