User talk:Your Favorite Writers Writer

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Your Favorite Writers Writer, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Cleveland Jones, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! TheOneWorkingAccount (talk) 07:11, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cleveland Jones[edit]

The article Cleveland Jones has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Two of the articles have only passing mentions, and one seems to a PR interview. Doesn't seem to meet WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheOneWorkingAccount (talk) 07:11, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I've moved your article to Draft:Cleveland Jones where you can work on improving it before submitting for review. The issues are:

Apparent lack of notability (see PROD notice)
Promotional language
Promotional links

You should also be aware of the Wikipedia:Conflict of interest guidelines. Deb (talk) 08:20, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Travell Mazion[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Travell Mazion requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Comatmebro (talk) 05:40, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Jaime Munguia into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. So Why 07:42, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Cleveland Jones[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cleveland Jones, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Drmies (talk) 04:40, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fly As Day[edit]

Hello Your Favorite Writers Writer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Fly As Day for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Crystallizedcarbon (talk) 06:08, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cleveland Jones (October 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pythoncoder was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cleveland Jones and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cleveland Jones, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:38, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Your Favorite Writers Writer! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 00:38, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Mancini[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Mancini, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JC7V-constructive zone 03:10, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Mancini[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John Mancini, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JC7V-constructive zone 03:51, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. JC7V-constructive zone 03:52, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of John Mancini[edit]

Hello Your Favorite Writers Writer,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged John Mancini for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons. For more details please see the notice on the article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

SamHolt6 (talk) 04:42, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Sean Kelly (Entrepreneur)[edit]

Hello, Your Favorite Writers Writer,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Sean Kelly (Entrepreneur) should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sean Kelly (Entrepreneur) .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

JamesG5 (talk) 08:26, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jersey Champs[edit]

The article Jersey Champs has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ORG notability, one article in the local newspaper and social media profiles are not enough

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rusf10 (talk) 15:39, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jersey Champs for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jersey Champs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jersey Champs until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rusf10 (talk) 17:49, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editing with a possible conflict of interest?[edit]

Hello, Your Favorite Writers Writer. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.--SamHolt6 (talk) 21:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a paid editor never have I received money from any of the subjects in which I have written a Wikipedia article on. The subjects which I have written articles on were researched by myself or pages of entertains or athletes in which I have personally run across via the internet. I am a blog writer and I'm always looking for content in which is not being brought to the four front that should indeed be.Your Favorite Writers Writer (talk) 17:14, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Bardown Hockey[edit]

Hello, Your Favorite Writers Writer,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Bardown Hockey should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bardown Hockey .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Meatsgains^(talk) 01:27, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Paid editing[edit]

You were informed in a thread above that you must declare if you are a paid editor and the information you must provide. You have not responded to that thread. You editing pattern shows every sign of being a paid editor. Please explain what is going on before editing any more articles. SpinningSpark 11:44, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I just responded to the thread above, I am not a paid editor and I'm not interested in becoming a paid editor. My focus is on researching subjects in which are entertainers and athletes of real people inside of their occupation Major sports individuals, Hip Hop artist etc that have solid links via the Internet etc. Individuals of such I write articles on. I do not know any of these individuals personally.Your Favorite Writers Writer (talk) 17:22, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Your Favorite Writers Writer: RE Hip Hop artists (or any other musicians) who have "solid links via the internet" that is NO indication that they meet the criteria for a Wiki page. These days anyone can set up a Soundcloud and YouTube and get 100K followers (especially if they pay) and put out a bunch of "albums" that are just digital tracks. There are specific lists for what qualifies someone, you should check out WP:NMUSIC for details. JamesG5 (talk) 03:20, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JamesG5: Thank you for the insight, however, I am aware of Hip Hop artist (or any other musicians)which can set up a Soundcloud and Youtube and those that pay for 100k followers etc. You must understand I am a Client of a major sports agency I can tell off the back who is cheating the system as in purchasing followers etc. Of course, Soundcloud and YouTube isn't enough the individual(s) will have to have a strong presence, for example, a Jay Z, hmmm a first round pick NFL, MLB, this can fall in place of managers, staff etc. Again I thank you and will look over the specific lists for what qualifies someone WP:NMUSIC and will check out the details.Your Favorite Writers Writer (talk) 18:38, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

What did you mean when you said "I am a Client of a major sports agency". This sounds like you have a conflict of interest in at least some of the things you write about and you are not declaring them, as you are obliged to do. SpinningSpark 21:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Spinningspark: What I mean is I understand the difference in which::@JamesG5: was sharing "I am a Client of a major sports agency" anyone can say that without proper research on whomever is claming to be whom. I look beyond just Soundcloud and social media followers ::@JamesG5: was speaking as if I wasn't aware and shared with me and I appreciate him for sharing as iron sharpens iron.Your Favorite Writers Writer (talk) 04:58, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about DJ E5QUIRE[edit]

Hello, Your Favorite Writers Writer,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether DJ E5QUIRE should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DJ E5QUIRE .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

Flooded with them hundreds 05:52, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Travell Mazion moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Travell Mazion, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 15:08, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cleveland Jones (December 31)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DavidWestT was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Add reliable sources to support.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cleveland Jones and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cleveland Jones, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DavidWestT (talk) 17:12, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. SmartSE (talk) 20:58, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your explanation above is far from convincing. SmartSE (talk) 20:59, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Travell Mazion[edit]

Hello, Your Favorite Writers Writer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Travell Mazion".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 23:24, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cleveland Jones concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cleveland Jones, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:39, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cleveland Jones[edit]

Hello, Your Favorite Writers Writer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cleveland Jones".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 20:17, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]