User talk:YeldraY
So everything I did has been reverted because of the "personal preference" of another editor!? All I tried to do was improve the references ... I didn't know that Wikipedia doesn't like the Harvard Style of reference. Why does the project keep this style of referencing if editors have serious issues with that style??
I'm finished.
YeldraY
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)