User talk:Yeahimadethis

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Yeahimadethis, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! DThomsen8 (talk) 20:23, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Valley Report (September 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Yann was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of websites and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Valley Report and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Yann (talk) 17:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yeahimadethis, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Yann (talk) 17:49, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:The Valley Report concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:The Valley Report, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:52, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Valley Report[edit]

Hello, Yeahimadethis. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "The Valley Report".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:15, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I just took a look at Dave Weasel. The sourcing at this point would probably not pass WP:ANYBIO or WP:CREATIVE. At a glance, it looks like it's just WP:TOOSOON. The sources are few and weak. (I was going to advise merging into The Valley Report, but that article has the same sourcing problems).E.M.Gregory (talk) 19:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Valley Report for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Valley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Valley Report until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nomination of Dave Weasel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Weasel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Weasel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Hardest task for editors[edit]

The hardest task for Wikipedia editors, in my opinion, is the creation of biographies of living persons. Dead persons are somewhat easier, and other subjects are often easier yet. You should gain experience by editing or improving articles before creating living persons biographies. I did what I could for your two articles, but they are likely to be deleted. Put copies in your sandbox before they are gone.--DThomsen8 (talk) 19:59, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, the editor nominating for deletion is not angry at all, he is attempting to follow what he thinks best for Wikipedia, and he may be right, but an Administrator will decide after about a week. You and I have asked for the articles to be kept. (Notice my style and do likewise.) Read Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. --DThomsen8 (talk) 20:30, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring[edit]

You are now edit-warring at Dave Weasel to add multiple violative edits, including breaking the core policy of WP:BLP and re-adding deprecated infobox fields. Reverting again will result in admin intervention, and given that you have a days-old history of edit-warring this will likely result in your being blocked from editing Wikipedia. Per WP:BRD, after you're reverted, you take your issues to the talk page of the article to try to achieve consensus with other editors. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:07, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, "citation is not needed on 99% of all other living person pages" is absolutely, unequivocally false. Please read WP:BLP. Any biographical pages for living people without strict WP:RS citing of personal-life claims are in violation of that policy and the information must be removed. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:13, 27 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for finally inserting a citation. I've cleaned up the formatting and archived the link. Please note that per Template:Infobox comedian, the "Influenced" and "Influenced by" fields are deprecated and no longer used. --Tenebrae (talk) 23:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please start discussing your issues on the Dave Weasel talk page, the way we're supposed to? --Tenebrae (talk) 23:47, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bill Burr: I'm Sorry You Feel That Way has been accepted[edit]

Bill Burr: I'm Sorry You Feel That Way, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Ya sh ! 18:54, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Use of thumbnails in Infoboxes[edit]

Hello! Thank you for your recent contributions to The Valley Report. I did have one note for you. I am working on a maintenance project to clean up Category:Pages using infoboxes with thumbnail images. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). If you have any questions, let me know! :-) --Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:58, 18 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dave Weasel[edit]

You were told here that the "Influenced" and "Influenced by" fields in the Infobox comedian template have been deprecated and are no longer used. See for yourself, here. If you continue to add either of those fields to the infobox, as you did here, an admin will take it as a clear sign of vandalism and may block your editing privileges. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:44, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dave Weasel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Weasel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Weasel (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 22:39, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Valley Report for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Valley Report is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Valley Report (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. World's Lamest Critic (talk) 20:23, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Valley Report Logo.png[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Valley Report Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:22, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jim Jefferies: Freedumb (November 24)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kiteinthewind was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of films, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jim Jefferies: Freedumb and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 00:45, 24 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dave Weasel for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dave Weasel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dave Weasel (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ad Orientem (talk) 20:09, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jim Jefferies: Freedumb concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jim Jefferies: Freedumb, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:34, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Jim Jefferies: Freedumb[edit]

Hello, Yeahimadethis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Jim Jefferies: Freedumb".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 04:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]