User talk:Yardilarn

Gonna fly now?[edit]

If you've got questions, they're better asked on the talk page. As for anything else, I was having a frustrating day dealing with a stubborn editor. I do apologize for being rude. TREKphiler ^{any time you're ready, Uhura} 13:39, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yardilarn, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Yardilarn! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! AmaryllisGardener (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

August 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Messerschmitt Me 262 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[http://forum.largescaleplanes.com/index.php?showtopic=56838/ Describes Me-262 blisters of MK-108

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:23, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

December 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm DiscantX. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Messerschmitt Me 262— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Discant X 02:36, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Messerschmitt Me 262 with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Discant X 02:39, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Focke-Wulf Fw 200 Condor with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 02:44, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Junkers Ju 390. Donner60 (talk) 02:47, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:43, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Cake453.jpg[edit]

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Cake453.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 03:44, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yardilarn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good evening, I understand that I was blocked from my wikipedia editing privileges for continuously disrupting wikipedia articles. My reason for doing so was because I was simply utilizing clean humor, nothing crude, and just trying to give others a good laugh. I had no intent to damage wikipedia and, honestly, the edit was not made by the original owner of this account. I apologize for my behavior and respectfully request to have my wikipedia editing privileges reinstated. I will not make anymore silly edits and swear to not do so again. Once again, I deeply apologize and will not allow for this to occur again. Sincerely, YardilarnYardilarn (talk) 04:18, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

(1) You were warned four times to stop (2) we don't unblock compromised accounts. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 05:41, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Yardilarn (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Good afternoon, 1) Your logic is off about the "warned four times." I was stopping after the fourth time. I didn't do it the fifth time, and 2) I would like to mention that that person no longer has my account info. I would only want to constructively edit Wikipedia. Very respectfully, Yardilarn Yardilarn (talk) 17:17, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't unblock compromised accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 17:23, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.