User talk:XxXKatieLouXxX

Hello, XxXKatieLouXxX, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Snowysusan (talk) 12:47, 30 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

January 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm MrX. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Phil Lester, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Please also provide edit summaries for your edits as it helps other editors understand what edits you have made. - Mr X 22:29, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Phil Lester. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. All BLP content must be referenced to independent, reliable sources. (YouTube is self published, and is not a reliable source, nor are personal blogs). Please do not keep adding unsourced material to this article. - Mr X 22:40, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding my edits on the article Phil Lester you stated that I haven't provide a reliable source and that "YouTube is self published, and is not a reliable source, nor are personal blogs". While I used two YouTube sources, the other four sources I have used are:

http://www.radiotimes.com/news/2012-11-09/vernon-kay-and-reggie-yates-to-leave-radio-1

http://www.bbc.co.uk/mediacentre/latestnews/2012/r1-weekend-schedule.html

http://www.channel4.com/news/the-rise-of-the-vloggers

http://theyorker.co.uk/legacy_articles/729

None of these sources are personal blogs. I also apologise for my computer uploading my edits multiple times, this was not my fault but rather the fault of an old computer. I would like you to reconsider my edits as the allegations you put forward are not fully true. Thank you. XxXKatieLouXxX (talk) 23:24, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The references shoudl be adjacent to the text that is being added, in the form of footnote citations. For example, which of four sources are you using to support his birth date?

Another example, is:

"He lives with his best friend Daniel Howell in London. A regular appearance in Lester's videos is a cuddle lion toy (called Lion), which usually sits at the back of the videos, speaking to the audience through annotations. Through this, Lester's separate fanbase call themselves Philions. He has appeared on TV numerous times including being on The Weakest Link."

which you cited to this URL: http://theyorker.co.uk/legacy_articles/729

But none of that content about his personal life is in that source.

The first source that you provided (above) goes to a page that says "Hmm, something went wrong…"

There are other examples, but rather than giving an exhaustive list, you should make sure that each new fact that you add can be tied to an adjacent, inline reference. If I, or someone else, check that reference and don't find the information, or it comes from a self published source, then it will be removed. The guidelines for BLP's are very strict, and given the vandalism that has already occurred on this article, it is going to be carefully scrutinized. I hope that helps. - Mr X 23:43, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Archbishop Blanch CofE High School concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Archbishop Blanch CofE High School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 15:52, 20 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Archbishop Blanch CofE High School (October 6)[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Archbishop Blanch CofE High School.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! TKK! bark with me if you're my dog! 04:21, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Archbishop Blanch CofE High School concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Archbishop Blanch CofE High School, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 2 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Archbishop Blanch CofE High School[edit]

Hello XxXKatieLouXxX. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Archbishop Blanch CofE High School".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Archbishop Blanch CofE High School}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 12:01, 6 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]