User talk:Wronkiew/Archives/2010/February

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Mass manual archive

Seeing that your inactive, I've gone ahead and manually archived things. Netalarmtalk 00:28, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

ISS FAC4.

Hello there! As an editor who has posted a comment in one of the recent Peer Reviews, GANs or FACs of International Space Station, or who has contributed to the article recently, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind commenting in the current Featured Article Candidacy with any suggestions you have for article improvements (and being bold and making those changes), whether or not you feel any issues you have previously raised have been dealt with, and, ultimately, if you believe the article meets the Featured Article guidelines. This is the fourth FAC for this article, and it'd be great to have it pass. Many thanks in advance, Colds7ream (talk) 16:44, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

Banner ad. Sexist?

Howdy. Just saw your banner ad for Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Space Colonization. It's nice, except IMHO blatantly sexist. ( Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Space_Colonization#Banner_ad ). Can fix? -- Writtenonsand (talk) 15:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)