User talk:Wronkiew/Archives/2009/November
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
DustyBot and editor reviews
I have an old editor review that I'd thought would have been archived a couple of months ago. Someone just asked me a question on it today, which was a bit of a surprise. I know that your bot archives all reviews that have at least one reviewer thirty days after they've been created. In my situation, I still didn't have any reviews after 30 days, and then got one later. It looks like the bot didn't pick up on that — does someone need to archive it manually, or should the bot have caught it? Mlaffs (talk) 15:56, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Hello there! As an editor who has posted a comment in one of the recent Peer Reviews, GANs or FACs of International Space Station, I was wondering if you wouldn't mind commenting in the current Peer Review as to whether you feel your original comments have been dealt with, if you see any new issues with the article, and whether or not you believe the article will meet the criteria for Featured Article status. Any new comments you have would be greatly appreciated. Many thanks, Colds7ream (talk) 17:02, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Hey there, unfortunately you haven't edited in a few months, and this is to inform you that I've added you to the list of missing Wikipedians. If you should decide to return just go ahead and remove yourself from the list. Hope to see you again. Regards, Ϫ 05:09, 8 October 2009 (UTC)