User talk:WokeHuke

June 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Isaidnoway that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. © Tbhotch^™ (en-3). 03:33, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Take the protected status off up WokeHuke (talk) 09:19, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Look here, WokeHuke. This is an administrator talking. I installed the protection on Up because of you. You were WP:Edit warring, repeatedly inserting your own version even though it is just your opinion and is against WP:Consensus. That kind of edit warring can get you blocked from editing. By applying the protection, I saved you from getting blocked. But the protection is not going to last forever. If, after the protection is expires, you go back to putting in this unproven opinion of yours, I will block you from editing that page. I hope that is clear enough. -- MelanieN (talk) 19:41, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

“Falls to his death” is an unproven opinion WokeHuke (talk) 19:45, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is supported by sources. Yours isn't. -- MelanieN (talk) 20:06, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One source you linked was another wiki, which can be edited by anyone, the other made no mention of Muntz death WokeHuke (talk) 20:08, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And what are your sources? -- MelanieN (talk) 22:00, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’ll be requesting arbitration since you failed to remain civil and unbiased in this, you also failed to address the fact that Russell floats on balloons as a counter point to your “how many balloons would it take to float” argument and instead closed the discussion, thus losing your cool and failing to disengage and act in good faith as cited in the resolution guidelines. WokeHuke (talk) 20:27, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The only thing a request for arbitration will result in is your arguments being added to Wikipedia:Lamest edit wars. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 20:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It’ll result in the right plot being published WokeHuke (talk) 21:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It will result in failure. El_C 21:04, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

For you? WokeHuke (talk) 21:09, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess we'll find out. El_C 22:03, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@MelanieN The movie itself? Does the kid float on balloons? Yes WokeHuke (talk) 22:31, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a timesink for other editors. likely trolling, possible incompetence, but either way, that's enough of that.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Floquenbeam (talk) 22:34, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

People choosing to respond this conversation is not my fault and I am still able to edit so are you trolling WokeHuke (talk) 22:51, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are blocked, so you are able to edit your user talk page only (and no other page) — a privilege which may also end up being revoked. El_C 22:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Til I log out, or use another account, or one of many other options. You obviously don’t know how to Wiki El_C. Hate to see authoritarian methods from such a reputable website. Guess I’m on to an alt WokeHuke (talk) 23:24, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, what do I know, I've only joined in 2004 and became an admin in 2005. Talk page access revoked. El_C 23:29, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]