User talk:Wipeouting

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2nd AfD for Nadini Premadasa[edit]

Hi, I see that you have unsuccessfully tried to nominate this article for deletion for the second time. If you know that the article is not substantially different from the first incarnation, please feel free to nominate for speedy deletion (Db-g4). For now, I'll just try to fix the AfD for you. Jarkeld (talk) 19:35, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Please state why you nominated the article for deletion at the discussion page here. Jarkeld (talk) 19:43, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I closed the AfD because the article was g4'd as I said above. It's a good option in these cases. Jarkeld (talk) 17:53, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

lionel wendt[edit]

There are still problems because you are reusing the original author's style and words. It is common because, we learn of the subject from the source. I will look into today. you are getting better, but still lots of work to be done. It would help, if you wrote down your points in sinhala and then retranslated them into english in your own words. (works for me). will do a rewrite later in the day.--Sodabottle (talk) 04:50, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid I have not got time actually to help re-write this article, and I don't think I would be good at it, but I can give you some ideas:
  • To avoid what you write being too close to the original sources, first read the sources carefully again, then go away and do something else for an hour or two, then write the article in your own words. After that, you can check it against the sources to make sure it is accurate, but if you make any changes then, be sure not to take actual sentences from the sources
  • Then you can ask for comments at WP:Requests for feedback. If you do that, explain that you are trying to avoid copyright problems.
Regards, JohnCD (talk) 10:00, 13 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Premakeerthi de Alwis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)[edit]

Semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism. Wipeouting (talk) 17:28, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wipeouting, I see that you are persisting in adding your edit based on a self-published source. I have begun further discussion at Talk:Premakeerthi_de_Alwis#FAO User:Wipeouting, but would suggest you refrain from retrying your edit until consensus is reached. To continue with your insistent addition of this information could be construed as disruptive editing, a link you should read. Thanks, Bigger digger (talk) 15:56, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright block[edit]

You have been indefinitely blocked from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from other sources without verifying permission. You have been previously warned that this is against policy, but have persisted.

Please take this opportunity to be sure you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. If you believe this block is unjustified or if you are able to provide a credible assertion that you understand and intend to comply with these policies, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Moonriddengirl (talk) 22:57, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid that it seems you are unable to stop copying content onto Wikipedia. In a series of edits to King George Hall, Colombo over yesterday and today, for instance, you added the following text:

The University of Ceylon was established in July 1942. Its predecessor was the Ceylon University College (UC), about 20 years extant, affiliated to the University of London. The Chancellor of the was The Governor of Ceylon, and its first Vice- Chancellor was Dr. Ivor Jennings On the opposite side of Thurstan road were cited the Science and Arts Blocks, King George’s Hall, the main lecture hall and the cricket grounds.

This source says:

The University of Ceylon was established in July 1942. ...Its predecessor was the Ceylon University College (UC), about 20 years extant, affiliated to the University of London.... The Chancellor of the U of C was ex officio The Governor of Ceylon, and its first Vice- Chancellor was Dr. (late Sir), Ivor Jennings, a fortunate and laudable acquisition indeed...On the opposite side of Thurstan road were sited the Science and Arts Blocks, King George’s Hall, the main lecture hall and the cricket grounds....

It goes on.

Your contributions to that article have been deleted. Your other contributions will be evaluated for copyright concerns as well. Our copyright policies have been explained to you many times; I do not believe you should be permitted to continue editing without some very clear and plausible indication that you will follow these policies. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 23:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wipeouting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have done huge contribution promote original issues from Sri Lanka.I tried to do my best make credit for original source. If i made Copyright violation ,I request a Appeal unblock my account and promise to read regulation do my editing further

Decline reason:

It's not a matter of 'if', you violated copyright. Until you admit this and show you understand the rules, you will remain blocked. Stephen 05:11, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wipeouting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I agreed that i have violated copyrights .I will promise that i don't make any violence further

Decline reason:

I am not able to tell, from reading this, whether you understand what copyright is and have a plan to edit differently, or not, because you have not explained in any detail. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:06, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wipeouting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(no reason given)

Decline reason:

I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. Kuru (talk) 16:56, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

More about the current concerns[edit]

Wipeouting, respectfully, I believe that you are probably attempting to do something on Wikipedia that will prove nearly impossible at this point in your efforts to add extensive text. If you are not fluent in English (as some of your talk page comments suggest you may not be), you are likely to find it extremely challenging to read sources and reformulate them in original language. I have some ability in a few other languages than English, but I don't believe I would be able to do this in any of them. While you are certainly fluent enough to converse well with others here, I worry that you are not fluent enough to compose extensive content. Copyright is a very serious matter on Wikipedia. So far, none of your efforts to rewrite articles that have been tagged for copyright problems have been usable because they have all continued to be copyright problems. I've asked other copyright workers on Wikipedia to review them just to make sure that others saw them as a problem as well. After the ones we've identified have been cleaned up by other people, you have come back and added copyright problems to them again and now, as with the above, all new articles have had copyright problems added. I do not believe that you are intentionally creating these problems, but since you keep creating them anyway I don't know how we can be sure that you will stop. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 17:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Friend , if it is possible to unblock I solve the problem you have Identified. I do my future works with out Violating any copy rights. you can block me permanently next time ? --Wipeouting (talk) 06:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

How would you propose to solve this problem? I don't see how you can avoid if it you intend to continue adding extensive text. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 11:31, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Moonriddengirl.I exclude all problem texts assist with other friends writers. surely i will continue my editing getting advises from other writers who have better experience than me. you can block me permanently next time if i make another fault. II really appreciate if you can assist me to solve my Problems . I wrote few unblock requests and all were rejected. what should i do next --Wipeouting (talk) 14:16, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps you should reconsider what you want to do here to help out. If your friends are able to access these sources and handle them in accordance with our copyright policies, why not point out the sources to them and allow them to compose the content? I would imagine that you could add sourcing to articles that need it, add infoboxes, contribute the various improvements that do not require composition without any challenge. It is far better for Wikipedia that we have incomplete coverage than that content is added to articles that does not legally belong to us. Not only might that get us into legal trouble, but it can also cause a lot of damage to articles down the road. If we find an article in 2010 that somebody added a copyright infringement to in 2008, we might lose two years worth of work from other editors to that content. If you were willing to pledge to contribute in other ways than adding text, I think that might help. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 16:40, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Friend I understood, dangerous of copy rights violation very well now. I am not going to adding those problematic text or Violate copy rights further. I hope do my contribution to Wikipedia using other ways. I follow your and other friendly writers advises definitely.--Wipeouting (talk) 18:57, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you would agree to voluntarily restrict yourself to contributing in ways that do *not* add text to articles, I would recommend that you replace your last unblock request with a new one explaining your willingness to do so and why. As I said before, I don't believe that you have intentionally caused troubles, and I would be inclined to take your word for it myself. However, another administrator will review your request. But I do have to caution you that you would need to be careful here. It's for everybody's benefit if you stick with your restrictions, because I know you can contribute valuably to the project in other ways that will not risk future copyright problems. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 19:10, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Friend , I perform on Wikipedia as I promised you --Wipeouting (talk) 04:56, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Dear friend ,What should i do for unblock ? Could you please assist me ? --Wipeouting (talk) 12:00, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest waiting a week or so and coming back with a very clear pledge to not add text anymore, but only to contribute in other ways. What you wrote in your last unblock request ("I exclude all problem texts assist with other friends writers. Surely i will continue my editing getting advises from other writers who have better experience than me.") does not guarantee that you will stop the problem, since you refer to "problem texts". I'm afraid that we have to assume that if you could recognize clearly "problem texts", you wouldn't have added them to begin with. You've shown that you can do positive contributions that don't involve adding text, as here. (Although I don't at all understand why you removed so much sourced information from this article as well as useful categories like "Living people" and "Year of birth missing".) Ultimately it will be up to the community to decide if your pledge can be trusted and if it is worth the risk. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 12:56, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed most of information is in correct the article you mention on link two. He is a business man and there are lots of Promotional links are added as foot notes. I was tried to develop this Article writing from Middle of point of view. It was not finished because I was Band. I got your point and don’t go to Add text any more to Articles. I do my contribution like first link you mention. I hope write another appeal after week. Thanks --Wipeouting (talk) 12:45, 12 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]



This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wipeouting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

if it is possible to unblock I solve the problem you have Identified. I do my future works with out Violating any copy rights. you can block me permanently next time

Decline reason:

Having looked extensively at your editing history I find I have to agree with Moonriddengirl's concerns. It is not clear how you would be capable of contributing significant text without copying, and you have made no response to her questions about this. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:45, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

November 2010[edit]

Please do not add unsourced content, as you did to Iranganie Serasinghe. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. It seems there is a little bit or plagiarism from the article Sunday times 8 February 1998. Please see Wikipedia:Plagiarism as to exactly what we expect editors to avoid. Chaosdruid (talk) 02:58, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article has large sentences copied from the newspaper article Sunday times 8 February 1998 as well as really bad grammar and prose.
If you think it is possible that you may have included material in other articles whcih may be plagiarism or copyright violations please fix this as soon as you can.
Chaosdruid (talk) 03:01, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wipeouting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I exclude all problem texts assist with other friends writers. Surely i will continue my editing getting advises from other writers who have better experience than me. You can block me permanently next time if I make another fault. I really appreciate if you can assist me to solve my Problems.

Decline reason:

...and the proof of serial copyright violations continues to pile up while you're blocked. It appears that we will need to perform further repairs across the project. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 10:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Orphaned non-free image File:Iranganie Meedeniya.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Iranganie Meedeniya.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:33, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This file is not used now . it was removed by administrates --Wipeouting (talk) 06:12, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wipeouting (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I read all copy right policies of Wikipedia and I understood dangerous of copy rights violation very well .I promised to not make copy right violation again. I do my next editing without adding text to articles. I continue my editing with project in other ways . Please see some of my contribution [1] ,[2],[3],[4]Wipeouting (talk) 13:23, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Simply promising to observe copyright does not convince me that you understand copyright, especially since you can't even spell "copyright" correctly. I have removed your talk page access because your unblock requests are not becoming more convincing.  Sandstein  18:58, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

In reply to your e-mail, see WP:GAB for more advice. You may continue to appeal your block by e-mail to the blocking admin or to WP:BASC.  Sandstein  08:19, 19 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anushka Wirasinha[edit]

You may remember this article which was deleted at AfD in June. A new, fuller version has been prepared and, being asked for advice, I have decided that the best thing to do is to post it and relist at AfD for the community's opinion. I am notifying everyone who was involved before: your views are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anushka Wirasinha (2nd nomination). Regards, JohnCD (talk) 22:38, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Solias Mendis[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Solias Mendis, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2010/09/19/mon17.asp and http://sundaytimes.lk/980510/plus15.html and all other sources, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Solias Mendis saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 15:34, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Dhamma Jagoda[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Dhamma Jagoda, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2003/12/07/fea06.html and possibly more, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Dhamma Jagoda saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 15:39, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: Simon Navagattegama[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Simon Navagattegama, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a copy from http://www.sundayobserver.lk/2005/10/16/fea34.html and http://sundaytimes.lk/051016/plus/arts.html and more, and therefore a copyright violation. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Simon Navagattegama saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! VernoWhitney (talk) 15:44, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The discussion broadcasted on BBC.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The discussion broadcasted on BBC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 07:03, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gamini Haththotowagama.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gamini Haththotowagama.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Christmas Card[edit]

File:Wikisanta-no motto.png
Merry Christmas
At this festive time, I would like to say a very special thank you to my fellow editors, and take the time to wish you and your loved ones a very Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year. And, in case you can't wait until the big day, I've left you each three special presents, click to unwrap :) Acather96 (talk) 10:10, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
File:Green and Yellow Present.gif
File:Yellow and Red present.gif
File:Blue and Red Present.gif

Orphaned non-free image File:Lester James Peries Sri Lanka.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lester James Peries Sri Lanka.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

  • I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
  • I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
  • If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
  • To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
  • If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.


Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:00, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dr.martin wickramasinghe.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dr.martin wickramasinghe.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 04:46, 6 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:W. D. Amaradeva perera.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:W. D. Amaradeva perera.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:58, 13 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:The discussion broadcasted on BBC.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:The discussion broadcasted on BBC.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 04:25, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Henry Jayasena.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Henry Jayasena.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:20, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Henry Jayasena.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Henry Jayasena.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 12:09, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 04:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lionel Wendt.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lionel Wendt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:03, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dayananda Gunawardena.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dayananda Gunawardena.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:15, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Thissa Abeysekara.jpg[edit]

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Thissa Abeysekara.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 04:05, 4 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Wipeouting&oldid=1203070089"