User talk:WikiMaster500

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, WikiMaster500, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Daisy of Love. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Plastikspork (talk) 03:37, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy of Love (season 1)[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Daisy of Love (season 1), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Daisy of Love. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally moving or duplicating content, please be sure you have followed the procedure at Wikipedia:Splitting by acknowledging the duplication of material in edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 08:11, 5 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

tb[edit]

Replied on my talk page. Plastikspork (talk) 20:50, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if there is a name for the color code #20A020 then could you please help me find it.

Try this http://shallowsky.com/colormatch/index.php?hex=20A020 Plastikspork (talk) 21:35, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you very much it helped. WikiMaster500 (talk) 21:46, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great. I remember back in the day when we were restricted to only 256 colors. That was challenging. I believe there is some tool out there that will allow you to view a webpage as it would look to a person with red/green or total color blindness. Considering how many colors are being used in these elimination tables, it's probably not a bad idea to give it some consideration. The best idea is to at least make sure the information is in text form as well. Plastikspork (talk) 21:52, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Daisy of Love[edit]

FYI, I reverted your additions of episode summaries to Daisy of Love as it appears they were cut-and-paste from VH1's website. We can summarize with reference, but we can't copy-and-paste. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 06:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Date Trader[edit]

The article Date Trader has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Possible hoax as no references whatsoever have been provided to establish notability, much less that the show exists

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <>Multi-Xfer<> (talk) 23:43, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hey WikiMaster500, Do you mind if I delete this one? The only source is a VH1 blog with no date for the premiere. I would restore it at your (or anyone's) request as soon as a reliable airdate was released (see WP:NFF). Is that okay with you? Thanks! Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your quick response. I moved it to User:WikiMaster500/Date Trader, and I (or you) can move it back as soon as there is a confirmed castlist/airdate. Thanks again. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:47, 20 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tailor Made & It Run the City[edit]

A tag has been placed on Tailor Made & It Run the City requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 21:16, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I userfied this one for you as well, User:WikiMaster500/Tailor Made & It Run the City. Best regards. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:56, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Drake & Josh episode list[edit]

I noticed the edits that you made concerning the episode arrangement. The were actually 57 episodes produced not 60. The Go Hollywood film is not included considering it was shot on film and not on videotape like the other episodes in the series. As a matter of fact both of the Drake & Josh films, Go Hollywood and Merry Christmas were both shot on film. "Really Big Shrimp" on the other hand was a two-part episode that Nickelodeon promoted a film. QuasyBoy (talk) 19:43, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I made those edits is because according to Dan Schneider and other websites there were 60 episodes of Drake & Josh produced. Also, the film Merry Christmas, Drake & Josh was made after the actual series officially ended. The film Drake & Josh Go Hollywood was made before the series ended, which is why I included it in season three. I even have a reference in the summary of the episode Dance Contest, that I recommend you check, that says there were 60 episodes. If the Go Hollywood film was not included, than how can it add up to 60 episodes? WikiMaster500 (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see the reference now. But my only argument is that Go Hollywood was shot on film and not on videotape, like the other episodes. So why would they be considered "episodes" if the film had one set of opening credits and didn't have the opening theme song like the other episodes. Go Hollywood should be considered stand-alone film like Merry Christmas was. That's just my opinion. QuasyBoy (talk) 1:41, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Alright, then I'll point out on the Go Hollywood summary that it was shot on film and not on videotape like the rest of the episodes but was still part of the show before it ended, unlike the Merry Christmas film which was made later after the original series ended.

OK, I can accept that. :) QuasyBoy (talk) 6:02, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Fanboy and Chum Chum episode list[edit]

Hi WikiMaster500, I appreciate your contributions to List_of_Fanboy_and_Chum_Chum_episodes. I'm having some difficulty interpreting the edits made to this page. At some point there were a number of (albeit hastily written) episode synopses that have disappeared. I'm not very skilled at all things Wiki, so if I'm mistakenly assuming that you removed them, I apologize. If you did remove them, I'm respectfully curious to understand the rationale, as there does seem to be some value to that data. :) Thanks in advance! Cyphoidbomb (talk) 04:42, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I did remove the synopses. I changed the episode box to make it seem more organized. If you feel the need to change it back and add synopses, then I'm ok with that. Feel free to make any changes. WikiMaster500 (talk) 06:37, 25 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey.[edit]

Regarding this edit, where could I find the blog? I'm interested in reading it. - Donald Duck (talk) 16:36, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, I'll give you the link to Dan's blog WikiMaster500 (talk) 16:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I sure wish it didn't get cancelled. I'm sure that, while it may be small, there's still a chance Dan could revive it even after all these years. - Donald Duck (talk) 17:02, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I completely agree. WikiMaster500 (talk) 22:32, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wizards of Waverly Place episode list[edit]

The reason why I placed the film table in between season 2 and 3 is because the movie is in canon with the series. It follows the same plot line in the series, A few season 3 episodes actually make reference to the movie. So the placement of the film table is correct similar to List of The X-Files episodes and List of 24 episodes. Two shows that both had films released in between the time the series' were on the air. When the second Wizards film is released then that table can follow season 4. Quasy Boy 18:53, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you're saying and why you put it there. I just thought that it could be reasonable to separate the films in one table under the season tables. I may have been wrong to change it so you can revert it back to your way if you please. WikiMaster500 (talk) 19:33, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for understanding, I do appreciate your edits, though. You always edit in good faith. :) Quasy Boy 19:36, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ilm4cast.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ilm4cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:47, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Bret michaels life as i know it.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bret michaels life as i know it.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:05, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Ilm4fullcast.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Ilm4fullcast.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 18:20, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I want you to have this[edit]

		The Original Barnstar
		I, QuasyBoy award WikiMaster500, with this barnstar for minor but helpful work on the Nickelodeon episode lists.

Quasy Boy 21:05, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: iCarly Season 4/Season 5[edit]

About a month or so it was announced that show was picked for a 5th season and that it would premiere next year. My guess is when Dan said "new season" he must have meant season 4 production-wise which will have 13 episodes. Another set of 13 episodes will air for the 5th season. Here's a source: [1] and just for the record, I don't really like this show, LOL. :) Quasy Boy 05:45, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay thanks it's a little more clear now. And yeah the show is alright lol.

No problem. :) IMO, Drake & Josh will always be Dan Schneider's BEST show. Quasy Boy 22:03, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

About the iCarly Episodes List[edit]

Hi WikiMaster500

I just found out that you had complete mass up season 2, 3 & 4

The 1st episode of season 2 is "iSaw Him First" (Season 2,Episode 1) &
the last episode of Season 2 is "iFight Shelby Marx" (Season 2,Episode 25)

The 1st episode of season 3 is "iThink They Kissed"(Season 3,Episode 1 &
the last episode of Season 3 is "iBeat the Heat"(Season 3,Episode 20)

The 1st episode of season 4 is "iGot a Hot Room"(Season 4,Episode 1) &
the last episode of Season 4 had not air yet.

Season 5 is coming in 2012 with 13 new episodes only.

I know because i help out "Nickelodeon" alots.

iCarly Episode in order as dated are:
Season 1: 25 (08 September 2007 to 25 July 2008),
Season 2: 25 (27 September 2008 to 08 August 2009),
Season 3: 20 (12 September 2009 to 26 June 2010),
Season 4: 26 (30 July 2010 to Presents)
Season 5: 13 (Coming 2012).

Please look at my iCarly Wikia at:
http://nickelodeonproductions.wikia.com/wiki/List_of_iCarly_episodes

Thank You,
Edmund K Lo (ICarlyFan2009)

Here a note from Dan Schneider (Creator of iCarly): Dan Schneider announced in a Twitter post that they would be wrapping up on Season 4 with 12 more episodes, completing the original 26-episode order. On April 14, 2011, Nickelodeon officially announced the 5th season renewal of iCarly. A total of 13 episodes will be produced for that season, with production beginning in 2012 with the episodes airing later that year. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.90.101.172 (talk) 06:05, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, according to TVGuide and a couple other sites, season 2 actually contains 45 episodes. TV Guide has been known to be a reliable site in my opinion.

Here's the source to how I re-arranged the episodes. http://www.tvguide.com/tvshows/icarly/episodes-season-2/289614

Season five will premiere 2012, so season four must air till 2012. TV Guide may be wrong. -- Serienfan2010 (talk) 22:26, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is wrong. Dan never stated in that tweet that he will be wrapping up season 4 with 13 more episodes. He only says that he is filming about a dozen episodes (starting with iLost My Mind) and then the season 5 (production-wise) will have 13 more.

iCarky season 4 and 5[edit]

In this edit [2] and the other pages you changed, this is not correct, let me explain. Season 4 had an order of 26 episodes for the next season back in 2010, that would include the third and fourth production seasons. In April Nick said that they would renew the show for a fifth season but it would not air untill 2012, here is the reference, [3] with other references as well. it stated that production will start in 2012 and not even air untill season 2. Nick is saying it is a new season in the promo because it was a new season production wise. When Dan and the cast are taking about a new season they mean a new production season.

By next year it should all match with tv guide and all of the ther sites as well. Heres how it is supposed to be.

Season 1: 25 (08 September 2007 to 25 July 2008),
Season 2: 25 (27 September 2008 to 08 August 2009),
Season 3: 20 (12 September 2009 to 26 June 2010),
Season 4: 26 (30 July 2010 to Presents)(season ends in 2012)
Season 5: 13 (Coming 2012).

Here it is production wise

Season 1: 25 (Janrury 2007- September 2007)
Season 2: 45 (April 2008 - August 2009),
Season 3: 13 (May 2010 - September 2010
Season 4: 13 (May 2011 - July 2011 and another episode to be shot in a couple of months
Season 5: 13 Yet to be filmed

It is clear that Nick combined production season 3 and 4 and in the promo they said new season, refering to production

Many other sites are going this way, execpt tvguide since they kind of have to follow the production codes.Lolly Milley (talk) 22:11, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I understand what you're trying to say, but when Nick said they've renewed the show for a fifth season, they are talking production-wise because they also mentioned that Season 4 was filming in May 2011. Those are the production seasons. The show is currently in its fifth season now (airing-wise). There is a new opening and Nickelodeon promoted as a new season itself. The promo isn't talking about a new production season. It's kind of like the Season 2/Season 3 situation. In "iThink They Kissed" the opening seqeunce changed as well and it was promoted as a new season (airing-wise). I hope this clears things up.

iCarly S04/05[edit]

This is a direct statement to post above me: When you argue like this that the opener changed & with this a new season started then you've to put "iLost My Mind" in season 4 because it has the "old" intro. Dan just changed the intro to "iDate Sam & Freddie" & this should be the season premiere as far as new intros concerned. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dupewrest (talk • contribs) 22:23, 5 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In the intro for "iDate Sam & Freddie" Dan did not completely change it. He only made some tweaks on it. It's only a new season broadcast-wise when the opening credits change completely or if it's promoted as a new season.

Replaceable fair use File:Melanieamaro.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Melanieamaro.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Courcelles 05:40, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, WikiMaster500. You have new messages at Talk:List of Victorious episodes.
Message added 19:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Geraldo Perez (talk) 19:53, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:WikiMaster500[edit]

User:WikiMaster500, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WikiMaster500 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:WikiMaster500 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:WikiMaster500/Date Trader[edit]

User:WikiMaster500/Date Trader, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WikiMaster500/Date Trader and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:WikiMaster500/Date Trader during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:WikiMaster500/Tailor Made & It Run the City[edit]

User:WikiMaster500/Tailor Made & It Run the City, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:WikiMaster500/Tailor Made & It Run the City and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:WikiMaster500/Tailor Made & It Run the City during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 12:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Surreal life 3 cast.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Surreal life 3 cast.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]