User talk:Weymar Horren

Campaña del Palatinado

Gracias Weymar Horren, y gran trabajo también el tuyo. No dudaré en consultarte sobre el tema, y tú puedes hacer lo mismo, pero si quieres puedes complementar tú mismo cualquier artículo que yo haya creado, o cualquier otro. Hay mucho por redactar tanto en la Wikipedia en inglés como en la española sobre esta época. Lo de la plantilla de la Guerra de Sucesión de Jülich fue porque iba a crear un artículo sobre dicho conflicto, el cual acabo de terminar hace unos minutos. Se trata del Asedio de Aquisgrán 1614 (Siege of Aachen (1614)). Hay muy poca información acerca de la Guerra de Sucesión de Jülich en la Wikipedia en inglés, y en la española ni siquiera está redactado el artículo. Un cordial saludo. History6969 7:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Lepanto

I have already written this in the talk page of that Article; but im glad to write to you as well. DO NOT delete Referenced Info without any proper reason (given)! 3 different sources (Oxford Uni. Press / Chicago Uni. Press / US Naval Institute) are cited, and the exact info of these sources is given.(Daufer (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2012 (UTC))

Siege of Grave (1586)

Buenas noches Don Weymar Horren. ¿Has pensado en crearlo? Por cierto, gran trabajo con la batalla de Noordhorn. Saludos. History6969 22:22, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

Gracias, incluso lo he propuesto para Good article. Ahora mismo estoy pensando en la batalla de Mülheim, más que en el asedio de Grave. La única (y olvidada) batalla campal entre Spinola y Nassau con el resultado inesperado de una derrota de los vencedores de Nieuwpoort se merece un buen artículo.--Weymar Horren (talk) 06:34, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

Perfecto. History6969 19:31, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Drake-Hawkins Expedition 1595

Buenas Weimar. Tengo una duda sobre la acción naval que tuvo lugar en las costas de la isla Guadalupe y la posterior defensa de San Juan. ¿La flotilla de 5 fragatas las comandaba el futuro Gran Duque de Osuna junto con el almirante Gonzalo Méndez de Cancio? No lo tengo nada claro. Gracias.[1] [2] History6969 22:31, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

La mayor parte de las fuentes coinciden a señalar al almirante Pedro Tello de Guzmán como comandante de la flotilla. Méndez de Cancio probablemente iba a bordo, pero ignoro en calidad de qué (quizás como 2º al mando). Osuna, por esas fechas, servía en Francia.--Weymar Horren (talk) 06:24, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Coincido contigo. (Pedro Tello de Guzmán/Pedro Téllez-Girón y Velasco Guzmán). El parecido del nombre ha hecho que algunos editores lo confundan con Osuna. Gracias de nuevo. History6969 13:58, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Battle of Noordhorn

Hello Weymar -- wanted to let you know I've commenced a review at Talk:Battle of Noordhorn/GA1; if you would like to participate please comment there. Take care! Cdtew (talk) 00:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Weymar, just wanted to let you know there's only a day left in the week old on this. If you need more time, I can afford you some, but if I haven't heard from you or if the comments haven't been addressed by Monday AM EST, I'll have to fail the article. Of course, if that happens the article can be renominated at any time. Take care! Cdtew (talk) 12:37, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Battle of the Dunes (1658)

Werner, I have moved our discussion to the article talk page: Talk:Battle of the Dunes (1658). We can continue it there. Thanks for the great information.Tttom1 (talk) 15:19, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Zutphen

Hello, I just wanted to introduce myself and let you know I am glad to be reviewing the article Battle of Zutphen you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Zutphen

The article Battle of Zutphen you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Zutphen for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by GA bot, on behalf of QatarStarsLeague -- QatarStarsLeague (talk) 15:09, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Catalan culture challenge

I've seen on your userpage that you speak Catalan: From March 16 to April 15 we will be organising the Catalan Culture Challenge, a Wikipedia editing contest in which victory will go to those who start and improve the greatest number of articles about 50 key figures of Catalan culture. You can take part by creating or expanding articles on these people in your native language (or any other one you speak). We look forward to seeing you! Amical Wikimedia--Kippelboy (talk) 08:47, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of the Lippe, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip II (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of the Lippe

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of the Lippe you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anotherclown -- Anotherclown (talk) 02:01, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of the Lippe

The article Battle of the Lippe you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of the Lippe for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Anotherclown -- Anotherclown (talk) 22:02, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Borgerhout, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Rampart, Earthworks and Perpetual Edict. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:49, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Borgerhout

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Borgerhout you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonas Vinther -- Jonas Vinther (talk) 23:42, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Borgerhout

The article Battle of Borgerhout you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Borgerhout for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jonas Vinther -- Jonas Vinther (talk) 00:42, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Battle of the Lippe

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Norreys, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Farnese. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1383–85 Crisis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Galicia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:33, 30 January 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Wilstett, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Battle of Nördlingen and Gustav Horn. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Battle of Willstätt

added links pointing to Main, Kinzig and Maximilian I of Bavaria

Battle of Callao

added a link pointing to La Presse

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Sant Esteve d'en Bas

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Battle of Sant Esteve d'en Bas you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 08:21, 5 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Sant Esteve d'en Bas

The article Battle of Sant Esteve d'en Bas you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Battle of Sant Esteve d'en Bas for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 08:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Battle of Sant Esteve d'en Bas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Catalan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 18 July 2015 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Battle of Sant Esteve d'en Bas

The article Battle of Sant Esteve d'en Bas you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Battle of Sant Esteve d'en Bas for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hchc2009 -- Hchc2009 (talk) 20:01, 23 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Weymar Horren. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Weymar Horren. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Weymar Horren. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)