User talk:Wenli/Archive 2

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Blade (disambiguation)

Hi. May I ask why you reverted my edits? I'm trying to clean the page up to conform with the guildlines in mos:dab. Is there anything specific about the changes I made which you disagree with? -- RoySmith (talk) 23:19, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for reverting your edits; I have reverted it back. I reverted it because I saw that you added "a gay newspaper" to the page. Now I know that it is really a gay newspaper. My apologies. — Wen li ^(contribs) 23:24, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

sup

I didn't intentionally vandalize that page. Christ, I removed it in the first place. I accidentally reverted the edit however, so I brought back the vandalizing that I got rid of. Sorry~! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xdgn (talk • contribs) 23:34, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I see what you mean. My apologies. — Wen li ^(contribs) 23:38, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

Fabrictramp RFA

Thank you for your support in my Request for Adminship, which passed with 50 supports, 1 neutral, and 1 oppose. My goal is to keep earning your trust every time I grab the "mop". (And I'm always open to constructive criticism and advice!) Again, thanks. --Fabrictramp 16:12, 25 September 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject External links

Thank you for joining WikiProject External links, a collaborative effort to have articles comply with Wikipedia's External links guidelines. Below are some ongoing tasks for you to take part in, or you can add a task to do. Another great place to check out is Category:Wikipedia external links cleanup. Happy editing, ARkY // ¡HaBLaR! 19:42, 27 September 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject External links tasks you can do:

WikiProject External links	This box: (watch • edit • changes • add / remove a task)
Open Tasks: Fix the broken links in the Featured Articles using the Checklinks tool Intelligent vehicle technologies (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) - Looking for a third opinion on some of the links in the article that appear to be commercial firms. Trying to avoid an edit war. Information Technology Infrastructure Library (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) There has been a long debate on external links to be included, third opinions invited in particular for the forum websites referenced that may be useful but are not discussed in the main article. Extreme pornography (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) This is about the term being used by the UK's Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008 but is obviously a controversial topic with a number of arguably useful pornographic example links added 2009 swine flu pandemic (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) As a hot news topic this article can suffer from excessive links from dubious un-official sources Model_View_ViewModel (edit \| talk \| history \| protect \| delete \| links \| watch \| logs \| views) The Open source MVVM frameworks section contains links to several products that would fail notability as having no coverage in independent sources, e.g. Mugen MVVM Toolkit. Is this linkspam? - Pointillist (talk) 09:28, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hi I didnt made any contributions to a video game page it must be a mistake [[[User:74.163.146.35|74.163.146.35]] 14:30, 2 October 2007 (UTC)]

Well, there are a few possibilities here. If you really didn't vandalize the page, your IP address may have been used by someone else who vandalized the page. It is also possible that your IP address may be shared with other people who may have vandalized the page. However, someone using your IP address did vandalize the page (proof). — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 01:04, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

Congratulations! You have been nominated for adminiship!

Goodshoped35110s would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Wikipedia:Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then contact Goodshoped35110s to accept or decline the nomination. A page has been created for your nomination at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Wenli. If you accept the nomination, you must formally state and sign your acceptance and answer the questions on that page. Once you have answered the questions, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.

-Go od sh o p 04:15, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

So, are you going to take it? If not, the instructions are all there. -Go od sh op ed 03:03, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Diavlog

THis should be nominated for speedy deletion. 99.230.228.58 18:09, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

WestSide Church

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westside_Church Can you please tell me why my article was considered for deletion? (In lay-man terms) Also, would you be able to help me sought out how the article can be removed from being deleted? If it is because the Church is not notable as far as you are concerned, would you mind helping me out sought out how I can show that it is notable? Thanks Spillon 14:07, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

ok ive put a secondary source there. please dont delete it. ive put a lot of work into it and believe it is fair and balanced and has no promotion or propoganda within it whatsoever. thanks again, Spillon 06:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

dj proper> yes it seems to be alot of people on wikipedia that try to delete anything related to being Christian or religon...i produced a remix for black eyed peas and have been established as a producer for years....they try to say that its nothing and shoud be deleted...i think alot of "editors" on this are nothing more than people that hate because they dont have anything notable in their lives ...i have 100 of shows done with famous people and done numerous offical projects with my work....still they say "its just some guy"...so my question is why do they care if a established church has a page ...must be they dont believe in the same so they want it not to be there....even if your church has raised money for people and changed 1000's of lives in a positive way.....guess in some people eyes thats not notable....maybe they are not "notable" themselves so they feel they have to try and control information that its obivious people want...like info on the church is important and established..... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.79.240.23 (talk) 22:38, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

The WestSide Church article is gone. --ginbot86 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ginbot86 (talk • contribs) 09:38, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

RfA thank-spam

Thank you!
Thank you for your help in my RfA. It hammered home a few things I need to keep in mind while admining and passed with a final tally of 40/0/4; two people forgot to vote in time, leaving me short of that exquisite number :-(, but I'll just have to fudge the next vote about me. Adminship feels slightly august but not particularily exalted, so I shall endeavour to consider it a toolkit and make sincere efforts to know what I'm doing before using it. If you later on have something to say or want to ask for --

MESSAGE EATEN BY BEARS --Kizor 10:25, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Adminship

OK, but will I edit-conflict you in any way? -Go od sh op ed 23:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

I have no idea what are your interests!!! How do I describe you?! -Go od sh op ed 23:39, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Hey hey hey!

I just checked your RfA and you have three supports so far (3/0/0) I supported you, because, man, you got a clean record; I warned people myself and did near-administrative tasks, but I will not try out to be an admin until probably in November. Good luck! -Go od sh op ed 02:50, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

You have one optional question waiting for you at your RfA. Doing so will probably increase your chances in becoming an admin (I'm not an admin, to clarify). -Go od sh op ed 03:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for welcome

Hiya Wenli,

Just a quick note to thank you for the welcoming me Wikipedia and tips on how to ask for assitance (help) :-) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 5T3RL1N9 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Re: Your RfA

You're welcome. You know, I tried to nominate myself for adminship, and I failed. They told me to try again in 6 months. Now I've seen you edit recently, and you fight vandalism and other stuff. At that rate, you may be able to try again in three months! Even more if you fight vandalism using Twinkle in possibly one month. Good luck! -Go od sh op ed 04:11, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Sonti; Great white shark; Marty Reasoner; WCWM; Alex Rodriguez; Egg magazine; Tuak; Enterovirus; Perris Union High School District; Criterion validity; Yahoo! Directory; Jimmy Wynn; Krum High School; Ferrimagnetism; Julie Wagner; Roz Weston; Soufflé; Yevgeny Khrunov; Aguardiente

Cleanup: Interdependence; Sumner Academy of Arts & Science; Panic! at the Disco
Merge: Alcopop; High-definition; AOL
Add Sources: Tom DeLonge; Sonny Moore; Vertebrate
Wikify: Guaro; Driving; Robert Wuhl
Expand: A1 (band); Eugene R. Black; Panthalassa

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 19:22, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Your bot request

Hi Wenli I wanted to let you know that Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/WenliBot is labeled as needing your comment. Please visit the above link to reply to the requests. Thanks! --BAGBotTalk 18:08, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

My RfA

Hi; thanks for your support to my RfA, which closed successfully at (51/1/2). I'll keep this brief since I don't like spamming anyone: I'll work hard to deserve the trust you placed in me. Thanks again. — Coren ^(talk) 23:34, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Regarding american freestlye association of long island.

This is information is regarding the history of bmx freestyle and how it was formed. The information is verifiable, by http://www.23mag.com/events/aba/ab872.htm. It is not used a means to promote and individual or group as it is a defunct governing body. Please explain deletion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaellauren (talk • contribs) 02:19, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Here is the link to results you can also google afa masters: http://www.23mag.com/events/aba/ab872.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaellauren (talk • contribs) 02:36, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

U'm ok?

U'm ok? i didnt understand that thing..-edited- i mean the last edit thingy-sorry

Dudafiery (talk) 03:11, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Wenli who are you in wikipedia? 0_0 ~(_8(I) HOMER SIMPSON! 04:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC) Dudafiery*

AfD nomination of Dutch Progressive Rock Page

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dutch Progressive Rock Page, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dutch Progressive Rock Page. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 23:19, 27 December 2007 (UTC)

League of Copyeditors roll call

Greetings from the League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the new requests system, which has replaced the old /proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial backlog which still exists there.
The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors.

Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 18:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)