User talk:Wdyctbg man

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Wdyctbg man, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the Teahouse.

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Table of contents / Department directory

The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Wdyctbg man, good luck, and have fun. ‑‑ElHef (Meep?) 15:44, 30 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Tapiola (Sibelius), did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 00:36, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^ Meh Wdyctbg man (talk) 01:57, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Flash Gordon (1996 TV series). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Jusdafax (talk) 02:46, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Thanga, you may be blocked from editing. Jusdafax (talk) 02:47, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

^ Try me, dudettes. Ciao! Wdyctbg man (talk) 02:52, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Trans-2,3-Butylene carbonate. Home Lander (talk) 15:09, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Spencer^T•C 15:26, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wdyctbg man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I'll use it sensibly now. Just wanted to have fun with the old Beatles line about Walruses, for some comedic relief in these difficult times. Please unblock me? I'l take the Wiki seriously now. Cheers! I swear on my life. And I'll take an Oath on the Holy Bible if you'd like me to. Wdyctbg man (talk) 15:30, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't need to swear to anything or take any oaths, but you do need to tell what constructive contributions you wish to make, such as what articles or topics areas you want to edit. As this request does not do that, I am declining it. 331dot (talk) 15:40, 1 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Wdyctbg man (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here: As noted above, I plan on using the Wiki sensibly from here on out. I wish to contribute to philosophy and mathematics pages (I have degrees in both), and engage in making the 'pedia a better place for all. Especially for academic research. I'd love to write on category theory pages, and algebraic topology, and particularly talk on the philosophical underpinnings of these fields, or indeed on connections between topological quantum field theory, category theory, and profound philosophical questions on the universe. I don't have original research, not that this would be fitting for here regardless, but I do wish to discuss these topics and enhance those kinds of pages. I've also written Ottoman Empire historiography papers and the like, so I could meaningfully contribute in various segments of the history Wiki realm! I could undo some vandalistic works on here too. We don't like vandalists: I understand better now. Their ideology of vandalism is bad. Ideological vandalism evangelists = a vandalist. Agree? I swear an oath now, and promise to do better, with each of these ideas in mind, and surely more in future. I can also add to Age of Empires related pages, and history pages that are lacking Age of Empires references in their popular culture sections (because I think this is genuinely sorely lacking, sadly, and I'd love to rectify that). Wololo! Cheers, lads. :) Wdyctbg man (talk) 22:30, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We've already been down this road before. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:09, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]