User talk:Walter55000

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/icarly (season 6).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nolelover ^Talk^·^Contribs 01:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/choclate milk.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! A412 (Talk * C) 01:42, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/istillpsycho (icarly ep.90-91).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! A412 (Talk * C) 01:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/poptropica game show island.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:17, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/POPTROPICA" GAME SHOW ISLAND.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Dori ☾Talk ⁘ Contribs☽ 02:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/24 carrot island (poptropica).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! B music ian 03:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/poptropica creators blog.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sumitkumarjha75 (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phineas and ferb (season 4)[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Phineas and ferb (season 4), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Themself (talk) 19:26, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Themself (talk) 19:27, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phineas and ferb (season 4)[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Phineas and ferb (season 4), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Luke (Talk) 20:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phineas and ferb (season 5)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Phineas and ferb (season 5) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Σ τ c. 20:25, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Phineas and ferb (season 6)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Phineas and ferb (season 6) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. →Σ τ c. 20:28, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

I have blocked you briefly, specifically for the above three titles but in general for the pointlessness of most of your edits. We do not need AfC categories created months in advance for example. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 20:33, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/george lopez (season 6).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 00:31, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/george lopez (season 1).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 00:42, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Block rationale clarification[edit]

Adding to RHaworth (talk · contribs)'s block against your account for 48 hours due to your obnoxious behavior, including submitting vandalism Articles for Creation submissions, and creating inappropriate pages, I am warning you, although I am not an admin, that if you continue behaving obnoxiously like this, your next ban will be longer or even permanent. If you feel this block has been placed against your account in error, feel free to appeal the block using {{unblock}}. Thank you. --B music ian 04:11, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/george lopez (season 1)[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/george lopez (season 1), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. B music ian 04:19, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

If you continue to use this talk page for adding gibberish and wasting our time, then your talk page access will be revoked. --B music ian 04:34, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have revoked it. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 10:47, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I have nothing against blocking the user indefinitely as a trolling/vandalism only account becuase xe seems only to be here for that very purpose. --B music ian 14:52, 13 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Warning[edit]

If all you are doing after the block is to game the system, as you did to The Fairly OddParents (season 8), you may be blocked again. --B music ian 02:53, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/icarly (season 6).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively, you can ask for help via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Fumitol|talk|cont 17:21, 15 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/istillpsycho (icarly ep.90-91)[edit]

A tag has been placed on Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/istillpsycho (icarly ep.90-91), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copied from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICarly_(season_5)

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Kinkreet (talk) 02:50, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article List of iCarly episodes, please cite a reliable source for your addition. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Kevinbrogers (talk) 21:40, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to List of iCarly episodes. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I reverted your addition because the website you've cited is a fan page, which fails WP:RELIABLE. Kevinbrogers (talk) 22:54, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/6th grade.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:56, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/poptropica game show island.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk or via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 00:57, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012[edit]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the article List of iCarly episodes has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. AussieLegend (talk) 03:11, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Two consecutive, different edits with identical edit summaries, neither of which is correct, indicate that you are copying and pasting edit summaries.[1][2] Edit summaries should accurately describe the edit that you have made. Given the number of edits that you have been making at List of iCarly episodes tat have been reverted by others, you should always use an edit summary. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:20, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to List of iCarly episodes. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Fan sites are not reliable sources and can not be used as references. The content that you have restored includes inappropriate removal of content, addition of unsourced dates and content sourced to a fan site. As such, nothing in your latest edit constitutes a valid edit and has been treated as vandalism, since you have been warned numerous times. AussieLegend (talk) 03:36, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, if you have a problem with your edits being reverted by multiple editors, you need to discuss them on the article's talk page, and not simply revert the reversions. The reversions you are making at List of iCarly episodes constitute edit warring and may result in you being blocked again. Based on your edits today, it appears that you are very close to, or may even have already breached the three-revert rule, which s a bright-line rule that we take very seriously. --AussieLegend (talk) 03:44, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at List of iCarly episodes shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. AussieLegend (talk) 03:46, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ICarly (season 5), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. AussieLegend (talk) 13:49, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/phineas and ferb (season 4)[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/phineas and ferb (season 4), is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. B music ian 14:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring[edit]

Please note, you have been reported for edit-warring at List of iCarly episodes. The report is here. --AussieLegend (talk) 15:07, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a short time for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Kuru (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Competence[edit]

On Wikipedia, competence is required. Your blocks are made because you lacked the competence required to edit while you contributed, in general.

You didn't seem to have learned much after your originally 48-hour block was made, which was extended to due your abuse of this talk page. You still persist in creating hoaxes and pages consisting entirely of speculation, despite the numerous warnings on your talk page.

You find a new bad habit - edit warring, and persistent violations of the "three revert rule". It is never right to edit-war, but it is right to resolve the disagreement by a discussion on the article's talk page. What do you do instead of trying to resolve the disagreement, despite warnings given to you? Continue to edit-war, which results in a block.

According to your userpage, you are still very young. I appreciate your enthusiasm to edit Wikipedia, but all editors need to show the maturity of an adult. Please review WP:YOUNG, WP:CIR, WP:NOT, and other policies before continuing to edit. I hope this helps.

--B music ian 10:38, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Walter, I will add that your use of an IP address to evade your block is evading a valid block. If you would like to be unblocked, please request an unblock using {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Evading a block won't help you achieve anything. --B music ian 04:14, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Subsequent[edit]

You have done more edits from the accounts and IP addresses listed below. I will leave the list open ended because, sadly, there will probably be more - check for User:Walter5*. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 21:12, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See this discussion about how others are being inconvenienced by Walter's persistence. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:33, 14 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Walter55000 (talk · contribs)
72.161.12.108 (talk)
Walter55024 (talk · contribs)
207.119.180.116 (talk)
Walter55034 (talk · contribs)
72.161.25.168 (talk)
Walter55056 (talk · contribs)
72.161.4.101 (talk)
72.160.169.30 (talk) - range blocked - quite an history
75.121.117.174 (talk) - 75.121.0.0/16 blocked
Walter55090 (talk · contribs)

2012-03-27	72.160.169.227 (talk) - range block re-instated - seems to have been working
2012-04-11	72.160.169.227 (talk) - came back on same IP as soon as the range block expired. So perhaps the single IP block will be enough.
2012-04-15	No it wasn't … 75.121.39.143 (talk) - 75.121.0.0/16 blocked again
2012-04-17	184.157.13.121 (talk) and five accounts registered - 184.157.0.0/16 blocked and all accounts blocked
2012-05-20	Mr.walter10000045 (talk · contribs)

Bmusician[edit]

Wow. It's surprising that his last edits were only two hours ago. B music ian 00:30, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Continued Socking[edit]

This user is still socking quite extensively - see WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Walter55000. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:36, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Walter is getting more devious, ie. making things more interesting for us! He does not come straight to my talk page as soon as he finds he has a new, unblocked IP address and he is using a variety of user names. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 00:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Message to Walter[edit]

Walter, I don't know if you're reading this (I suspect you're not, but next time you show up, maybe someone will refer you here), but can I give you some advice anyway?

The reason you were blocked is because you're really too young to understand how to go about building an encyclopedia and generally being part of the project - we realise you mean well, but you're just not up to the level of maturity and education yet. We have asked you to give up on it for a year or so, and then perhaps you can be let back in if it seems you've grown up enough.

But the way you are creating lots of new accounts, and editing anonymously, is hurting your chances of getting back. And we'll find your new accounts and block them for sure, because each one causes exactly the same problems, which are hard to miss - and you might think you're clever, but you're up against a lot of people who are a lot older and wiser than you, including some very smart people.

Should you appeal to be unblocked in the future, all of these accounts and all of your actions will be reviewed, and the more of this block-evasion we see, the less your chance of being allowed back.

So go and take that one year break, and spend the time doing the kind of things someone of your age should be doing. After that, you should only come and request an unblock if you can properly understand the problems you have been causing.

And don't try coming back until you have your parents' permission! How do you think they would react if they found out what you have been doing? -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:56, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved elsewhere[edit]

Walter has found my personal wiki and has been scribbling there! — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:59, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He's mistaken if he thinks he's getting back here in six months - but you deserve our gratitude if you can keep him there with you for a while, and out of our hair ;-) -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 01:00, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In the vague hope that Walter is watching[edit]

Hi Walter.

I'm just leaving you this message to hopefully get something across to you. You are currently blocked from Wikipedia, because we do not believe you have the ability to add anything positive to it. This is not necessarily always going to be true, at some point in the future, I expect you will be a great editor. However, the way you're going about things is not helping matters, you are making things worse. If you want to be unblocked, you need to do it in the way that is accepted by the community. Creating new accounts only makes it less likely that you will be unblocked. Stop doing that.

I know you don't have the password for this account, because your dad took it away, so please log into Walter55024 to make any unblock requests. If you like, you can email me using this link. I would suggest that you get your dad involved, so that he can edit wikipedia with you. Perhaps if you could get him to email me?

If you do want to get back to wikipedia though, there are some things you'll need to do first.

Show to us that you have the ability to edit productively. There are lots of wikimedia projects out there where you can show how great an editor you are - [all of these]. You could also show how useful you are by going to any of the Wikia projects. There's lots of them. When you've made lots of useful edits, come back and let us know and we'll look and see how great you are.
Accept that you've been blocked here. Don't try and get around it. Don't create new accounts. Be patient for a while and leave Wikipedia alone all together.

If you can do those things, I'd be willing to consider an unblock - but not before. Every time you try to avoid your block, you have to wait longer before you actually get unblocked. Worm^TT · (talk) 10:39, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission choclate milk[edit]

Hello Walter55000. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled choclate milk.

If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/choclate milk}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/24 carrot island (poptropica) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/24 carrot island (poptropica), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 13:22, 16 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/icarly (season 6) concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/icarly (season 6), a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 06:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/poptropica creators blog concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/poptropica creators blog, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 06:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/poptropica game show island concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/poptropica game show island, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 06:33, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]