User talk:Vulpesinculta51

January 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ronald Reagan, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ronald Reagan was changed by Vulpesinculta51 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.889707 on 2011-01-11T13:33:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:34, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:48, 27 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

April 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not include unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to Osama bin Laden, you must include proper sources. If you don't know how to cite a source, you may want to read Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you. Sceptre ^(talk) 08:45, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

There's something I need to discuss with you. Do you still edit Wikipedia? Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 21:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Um... yeah? Vulpesinculta51 (talk) 02:40, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Would you please register an email address? There's something I'd like to discuss with you privately before going public with it. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 16:45, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have started a Request for Comment on User:WLRoss here. Since you made some remarks on his User Talk page criticizing his embrace of conspiracy theory, I named you as a certifier of the RfC. Please post comments there regarding your experiences with WLRoss. Thank you. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 22:10, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Vulpesinculta51 (talk) 12:27, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Vulpes ... but I also need you to add your name below mine here as a second certifier. Like a motion under Robert's Rules of Order, this RfC/U will "die for lack of a second" unless I have a second certifier. The admins won't accept MONGO as a certifier because his dispute with WLRoss, while longer and more unpleasant than yours or mine, ended several months ago. They need examples of recent efforts to resolve disputes. If you choose, after you certify (simply by adding your name at the link here with four tildes ~~~~) I can carry the entire weight of the discussion from that point forward. Thank you for your attention to this matter. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 14:26, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please participate in further discussion about WLRoss here: [1] Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 20:20, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you do not "certify" the basis for this dispute, it will be deleted. Please certify the dispute at the link I provided here. Phoenix and Winslow (talk) 18:21, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Vulpesinculta51. I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 07:57, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. You might also want to read up a bit about citing sources. Happy editing! —Elipongo (Talk contribs) 07:57, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Flag of Hezbollah, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --Supreme Deliciousness (talk) 13:56, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Viktor Bout[edit]

In response to your question on the Viktor Bout page: yes, that's the consensus in the Western media, but no we can't say he is one. Believe me, I've read enough news reports to sympathize if you feel that's stupid, but that's also WP:BLP; we have to be lenient with the living, I guess. If you'd like to add something about his being widely regarded as, although never convicted of, being an arms dealer, feel free. (Even if his current trial ends in a conviction he still can't be called an arms dealer; he's only charged with conspiracy.) Fleetham (talk) 00:58, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Australian frontier wars[edit]

Hi, I've just reverted your change the caption for this article's infobox. The event is commonly called the Slaughterhouse Creek massacre (including in the image's record on the Australian War Memorial website). Could you please discuss this at Talk:Australian frontier wars if you think that the caption needs to be changed? Nick-D (talk) 11:06, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained deletion[edit]

Can you please use the edit summary box to leave an explanation when you delete content that's not obviously problematic, as you did at Pac-Man? Adrian J. Hunter^{(talk•contribs)} 11:59, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]