User talk:Vskapoor
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Kamal Nath appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe this important core policy. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 01:32, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
September 2015[edit]
Hello, I'm Cyphoidbomb. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Balochistan, Pakistan because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Diffs: [1][2] Wikipedia is not a forum for your personal opinions or gripes and statements like "there is no substantive proof" constitutes an argument from ignorance logical fallacy. Surely we're not going to take a random user's word that "no evidence of XYZ" exists. How does one prove a negative anyway? Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:35, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
- This edit isn't any better. "Substantive" is interpretive and subjective. Aside from just being able to vent your POV, why are you attempting to analyze this? A simple denial from an official from the other side of the argument would suffice. We don't need editorials. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:41, 30 September 2015 (UTC)