User talk:Vishalsathyan19952099

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 09:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to O. Rajagopal[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, O. Rajagopal, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 05:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at A. P. J. Abdul Kalam, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jim Carter 16:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jayaraj Warrier[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jayaraj Warrier requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. JDDJS (talk) 17:59, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016[edit]

Hello. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Vijay (actor) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:51, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sayed Umerali Shihab Thangal. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 22:24, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

November 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Robert Wadlow. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia.

Not only was it unsourced, it was incorrect.

☾Loriendrew☽ ☏(ring-ring) 04:09, 27 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Twinless twin[edit]

Hi, with no reference, and no article for either person listed in your addition, I thought it felt short of worthiness of inclusion in that list, so I removed it. This is a rationale I apply to most lists otherwise where do we draw the line at inclusion? Let me know your thoughts if you agree/disagree. Rayman60 (talk) 20:59, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 8[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Indian family names, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pillai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Vishalsathyan19952099. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Satyavati, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sati (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:46, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mahabharat (1988 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Feroz Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for continued disruption, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 21:01, 30 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vishalsathyan19952099 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I will try to add more references. After the earlier blocking, I added some references to the pages, after learning how to add them. But still, I went to the old way. This is my mistake.

Decline reason:

I see warnings going back some time for adding unsourced material. How will you go about sourcing further content? Please affirm you will respond to any further concerns that arise as they arise before proceeding with editing. Please elaborate on "prior block". -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 16:13, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What earlier blocking are you referring to?----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 15:54, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

looking at their block log Vishalsathyan19952099 has never been blocked before, so i suspect that it was on another account that they got blocked on suggesting that they are creating accounts to circumvent blocks. Lavalizard101 (talk) 18:01, 10 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was blocked because of the same reason about a week ago.

Well, its not showing up in your block log so can't have been on the English Wikipedia (it could have been on another Wikipedia such as the French Wikipedia for all I know) with this account. So either it was on another account or on another Wikipedia. Lavalizard101 (talk) 07:43, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 17[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Guruvayur Temple, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Janamejaya (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Guruvayur Temple, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Caution for addition of tonnes of unsourced and unencyclopaedic material, and removal of maintenance templates without fixing the problems. Wikipedia is an encyclopaedia, not a blog! - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 15:00, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Guruvayur Temple. Final warning for adding unsourced and unencyclopaedic material, only a few days after coming back from a two week block for the exact same thing! - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 15:03, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of three months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You have repeatedly been told that you must provide sources, and continue to fail to do so. The length of this block relates partially to the previous block which you disclosed but have not as yet provided requested details for. ----Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:33, 17 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vishalsathyan19952099 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have tried my best to add references, and has even added my own references. I now try to make pages only with references. It's just because of some other matter that you have blocked me now. Please unblock me. There is no need for blocking me now. I want to edit pages, and to add more references. The article of Guruvayur Temple in English is written with some partiality, but still lacks many important points of the temple, like the glory of the idol, the main features and festivals. I hail from the South Indian state of Kerala, where Guruvayur is located. In fact, it is just 20 km from my home, and I have visited there hundreds of times since my childhood, and I know many stories about it. I was just adding those stories with references.

Decline reason:

I took a look at a number of your most recent edits. None of them provided any references at all. And your claim that you know many stories about the temple is deeply concerning. Your block is quite literally because of your persistent addition of unsourced content. That you know many stories is not relevant. You are required to provide reliable citations, which you've been totally failing to do. Yamla (talk) 12:44, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|Anyway, I am now trying to add more references. You should unblock me.}}

Maybe Wikipedia is not for you, maybe you should seek another outlet. Cheers, - FlightTime (open channel) 12:55, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the other outlet? There is no any reliable source other than Wikipedia as far as I know.

Try, maybe Birdwatching. - FlightTime (open channel) 13:04, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I ask about online programmes, not birdwatching. Anyway, please leave me from this topic, and this blocking lasts just for a few time. After that, I'm free!

If you continue to add unsourced material when you return after the block, you will with all probability be blocked indefinitely the next time... - Tom | Thomas.W ^talk 13:38, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I have already read how to add various types of references to wikipedia.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vishalsathyan19952099 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Don't extend my block towards September. Please unblock me now.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you

understand what you have been blocked for,
will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vishalsathyan19952099 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was ignorant and it was because of some kind of spirit that I added posts without any reference. Its all my problem. I hereby request you to unblock me so that I can edit the pages to remove unnecessary parts and add necessary parts.

Decline reason:

I'm not sure if you want to blame your actions on some kind of spirit, but none of the above gives a reasonable assurance that the problems with your editing wouldn't recur if you were unblocked. Huon (talk) 21:53, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Proposed deletion of R. Ramachandran Nair[edit]

Hello, Vishalsathyan19952099. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, R. Ramachandran Nair, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want R. Ramachandran Nair to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks,

Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:22, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

K. Veeramani (singer) moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, K. Veeramani (singer), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 12:27, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Vishalsathyan19952099. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent addition of unsourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:25, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:K. Veeramani (singer)[edit]

Hello, Vishalsathyan19952099. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "K. Veeramani".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Lapablo (talk) 18:59, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 7[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited R. Ramachandran Nair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:39, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:45, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm Geniac. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Geniac (talk) 19:05, 4 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sundaranarayana[edit]

Hello Vishalsathyan19952099,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sundaranarayana for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Seawolf35 (talk - email) 14:09, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was actually writing about a Carnatic composer who started to write songs after retiring at the age of 60. I thought of including this article as a tribute to him, who died in 2013. Vishalsathyan19952099 (talk) 15:14, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Sundaranarayana[edit]

Hello Vishalsathyan19952099, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Sundaranarayana, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sundaranarayana.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheLonelyPather}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Cheers, --The Lonely Pather (talk) 15:31, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 15[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited R. Ramachandran Nair, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kanada.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024[edit]

Hello, Vishalsathyan19952099. I noticed that your recent edit to Thuravoor Viswambharan added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. Sam Sailor 17:05, 9 January 2024 (UTC) (please ping on reply)[reply]

How did you find it? Vishalsathyan19952099 (talk) 13:57, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding extraneous, unsourced details despite previous blocks.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 14:58, 16 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

I've been blocked due to the violating of guidelines, like unsourced references.. I promise you that I'll not repeat such mistakes, and therefore I request you to unblock me.. Vishalsathyan19952099 (talk) 14:10, 14 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]