User talk:VirusKA/Archive 14

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

→

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

News and notes: Grantmaking season—rumblings in the German-language community

Traffic report: Your average week ... and a fish

Featured content: Your worst nightmare as a child is now featured on Wikipedia

Discussion report: More discussion of paid advocacy, upcoming arbitrator elections, research hackathon, and more

In the media: The decline of Wikipedia; Sue Gardner releases statement on Wiki-PR; Australian minister relies on Wikipedia

WikiProject report: Elements of the world

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 04:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

Traffic report: 200 miles in 200 years

In the media: Rand Paul plagiarizes Wikipedia?

News and notes: Sex and drug tourism—Wikivoyage's soft underbelly?

Featured content: Wrestling with featured content

Recent research: User influence on site policies: Wikipedia vs. Facebook vs. Youtube

WikiProject report: Special: Lessons from the dead and dying

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 23:36, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

Traffic report: 200 miles in 200 years

In the media: Rand Paul plagiarizes Wikipedia?

News and notes: Sex and drug tourism—Wikivoyage's soft underbelly?

Featured content: Wrestling with featured content

Recent research: User influence on site policies: Wikipedia vs. Facebook vs. Youtube

WikiProject report: Special: Lessons from the dead and dying

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 23:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, pleaseconsult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
3,112	Personal computer (talk)	Add sources
858	Windows 2000 (talk)	Add sources
78	King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (talk)	Add sources
34	Motorola Xyboard (talk)	Add sources
152	Features new to Windows XP (talk)	Add sources
7,712	Operating system (talk)	Add sources
318	Smartphone wars (talk)	Cleanup
27	Jellyfish.com (talk)	Cleanup
1,889	Liquid-crystal display (talk)	Cleanup
401	Timeline of Macintosh models (talk)	Expand
819	Maruti Suzuki (talk)	Expand
34	Macworld/iWorld (talk)	Expand
150	Compositing window manager (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
541	Xiaomi (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
103	Palringo (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
59	Professional Developers Conference (talk)	Merge
3,217	Graphics display resolution (talk)	Merge
3,593	ARM architecture (talk)	Merge
866	Pebble (watch) (talk)	Wikify
63	Ben 10 (toy line) (talk)	Wikify
1,089	Microsoft Exchange Server (talk)	Wikify
6	Oppanakara Street (talk)	Orphan
3	Bing Audio (talk)	Orphan
2	Nirvana Phone (talk)	Orphan
10	Kyocera Zio (talk)	Stub
18	Archos 101 Internet Tablet (talk)	Stub
27	Samsung Intercept (talk)	Stub
543	Diary of a Wimpy Kid: Hard Luck (talk)	Stub
97	Samsung i5500 (talk)	Stub
71	Asus Fonepad (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 13:45, 7 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

News and notes: Alleged "outing" of editor's personal information leads to Wikipedia ban

Traffic report: Danse Macabre

Featured content: Five years of work leads to 63-article featured topic

WikiProject report: WikiProject Accessibility

Arbitration report: Ebionites 3 case closed

Discussion report: Sockpuppet investigations, VisualEditor, Wikidata's birthday, and more

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 07:33, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

Traffic report: Google Doodlebugs bust the block

Featured content: 1244 Chinese handscroll leads nine-strong picture contingent

Special report: FDC staff raise the benchmarks for activities, impact, planning, and governance

News and notes: Trademark at issue again with the Italian Wikipedia and wikipedia.it

WikiProject report: The world of soap operas

Discussion report: Commas, Draft namespace proposal, education updates, and more

Read this Signpost in full
Single-page
Unsubscribe
EdwardsBot (talk) 09:09, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

BRD notice on Red Screen of Death

Hi.

I thought I'd be more appropriate to drop you a line about your edit #582251313 in Red Screen of Death. Your edit summary reads: 'not even a mention on the BSOD article it was "merged" to.' Well, I can see the mentions. (Yes, there are two.) I can also see that there has been two past merge discussions (well, one and a half really) about merging and that the reasons supplied (i.e. lack of notability and extensive need for sources) are valid.

I think the merge was appropriate. What else can I say?

Best regards,
Codename Lisa (talk) 03:54, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. First, sorry for all these duplicate messages.

I understand what you mean but what can we do? The source and the notability are both serious issues. Now, I generally find Wikipedians to be very truthful but if I say I had never found a single statements that is inconsistent with the truth in the most surprising places, I'd have lied. I don't know who wrote that article but I only hope his contributions weren't facts mixed with his imagination. While I adore assumption of good faith, I also love sources.

Best regards,

Codename Lisa (talk) 00:13, 20 November 2013 (UTC)