User talk:Vicguyot

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Vicguyot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Mat Hennek, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  ttonyb (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article Mat Hennek has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ttonyb (talk) 14:37, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Vicguyot. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Mat Hennek, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:53, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Reference test[edit]

This is the text which you are going to verify with a reference.[1]

References[edit]

  1. ^ Reference details go here

May 2011[edit]

This is your last warning; the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

For persistent copyright violations, addition of promotional text, and conflict of interest. 99.184.134.27 (talk) 10:45, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, you appear to also have made the same edits as an IP account, and were blocked [1]. 99.184.134.27 (talk) 10:53, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mat Hennek for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mat Hennek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mat Hennek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Alexf(talk) 13:52, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Mat Hennek, you may be blocked from editing. Alexf(talk) 11:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:CZ-Cerchov-II.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:CZ-Cerchov-II.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Alexf(talk) 11:51, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:CH-Furkapass-V-2010.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:CH-Furkapass-V-2010.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Alexf(talk) 11:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:HeleneGrimaudIIMaine2006.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:HeleneGrimaudIIMaine2006.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Alexf(talk) 11:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:D-Radikow-I-2009.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:D-Radikow-I-2009.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Alexf(talk) 11:52, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because of disruptive editing. Repeated removal of AfD tags after warnings. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 11:53, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:CH-Nufenenpass-I-2009.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CH-Nufenenpass-I-2009.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 13:05, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help request[edit]

Hello, I do not understand why the wikipedia pages i created for photographer Mat Hennek has been deleted in english, and in french (?) I am the agent of this photographer, I work with him closely and all the information i have written is true, and reliable. I don't know what kind of "sources" i need to put, apart form his website, and his galleries' websites... I have created the pages many times, and it keeps getting deleted. This photographer is german, living, and there is no biography published on him. The photos are his photos, so how do I prove that he has the rights for intellectual property ? Thanks for the help

Hi, I do not see any pages you created, only some files, which have been deleted due to lack of licensing information. I also see that you are blocked indefinitely because of disruptive editing, and that this account is a vandalism-only account. Regards, TBloemink (talk) 12:59, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your answer. I did not even know that I was blocked indefinitely and that my account was vandalism-only... (???) This is so weird. I created two pages, which both have been deleted and they don't even show up in the search engine now. How can I fix this and be unblocked? I just want to create a page, for the artist I represent, Mat Hennek. He has a page in german already - i was not the one to create it, his former assistant did it - and I updated it ma few times. All I need is the same page in french and the in english and I do not understand why it is so hard to make. Also, I am not sure what the "licencing information" is. Is this the "source" ? I have no specific source, it is his life, his galleries, and his work that I am describing/presenting. And the photos are his photos... Please can someone help me get unblocked and figure out why wikipedia is deleting my pages all the time? Many thanks in advance

I see that you are blocked for removing the deletion template of your pages/file several times, which is not allowed. If you want to get unblocked, you need to follow the instructions in the message above, which says that you have been blocked. Regards, TBloemink (talk) 13:09, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I don't think "vandalism-only account" is a reasonable description. However, the fact that you are the person's agent means that you have a conflict of interest, and should not be writing about him here. However, you presumably know that, since you have already been told about it. It seems to me that the article you wrote was an attempt to promote its subject, but Wikipedia is not a free advertising service, and attempting to use Wikipedia for promotional purposes is against policy. If the person you wrote about is genuinely notable then probably some uninvolved third party will write a neutral article about him so that you won't need to do so. However, my searches have failed to produce any evidence that he is notable, and if he isn't then we do not need an article on him. I think it is very unlikely that you will be unblocked as long as it is clear that your intention is to promote a subject for which you have a conflict of interest. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:14, 7 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]