User talk:Vhhhhjhgy

May 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove maintenance templates without resolving the problem that the template refers to, as you did at Ganapathi Sachchidananda, you may be blocked from editing. Please fix the issues mentioned before removing the templates. -- DaxServer (talk) 16:38, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I used Warning level, as the page's history reveals earlier warnings were already given. -- DaxServer (talk) 16:39, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gilbert Étienne[edit]

Hello! Can I ask why you edit this article so often? Was it an editing contract, or did you know him? --- Possibly (talk) 06:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Possibly, I like to read about him on internet. So whenever I get a new info, I add it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Vhhhhjhgy (talk • contribs)

You like to read about a French economist on the Internet? To be honest it looks to me like you were involved in some way with the article, as a friend or as a paid editing contrast, as you keep returning to the article, over the past weeks, to add basically unnecessary things like yesterday's "lede too short". Is that the case, are you connected to the subject, or is this some kind of memorial?--- Possibly (talk) 06:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

I don't know what you are playing at, but stop sending "welcome to Wikipedia" messages to editors with much more experience than you have. By this alone, you show that you are not ready to be a Teahouse host (nor, probably, to get rollback, as you need to know perfectly well what you are doing and when to use such tools to get that right). Fram (talk) 07:55, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on my userpage[edit]

Hi, Your edit on my userpage was not warranted. If you find any discrepancy, please notify me, rather than attempting to edit it out by yourself. Thanks. --jojo@nthony (talk) 04:30, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You've just made hundreds of edits to a variety of pages unlinking things that don't need to be unlinked. This sounds like an error. Vhhhhjhgy, what are you trying to do? (Please stop using Twinkle if you're unsure how -- there's the potential to waste a lot of other people's time, unfortunately). — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 04:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mfield (Oi!) 04:34, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mfield, unblock me else it will be bad for you. Vhhhhjhgy (talk) 04:54, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Vhhhhjhgy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I will not do vandalism again Vhhhhjhgy (talk) 04:47, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You appear to be threatening another user above, so no, I am clearly not going to grant this unblock request. — The Earwig (talk) 04:56, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.