User talk:Veritas-truth101

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Fianna Fáil has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoygabsadds 01:02, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Batt O'Keefe[edit]

In addition to vandalising articles (like above), your biased editing of Batt O'Keefe is appalling. If you are angry or upset by the Budget 2009 then take it elsewhere, wikipedia is not the forum for expressing your outrage. Wikipedia is about providing, neutral and unbiased viewpoints especially in biographies of living persons, please read WP:BLP. If you can't contribute here in a WP:NPOV fashion then you should re-consider editing here at all. Snappy56 (talk) 12:11, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited O'Keeffe's page with full reference to the 30 cuts he has made to the Irish Education Budget. I do not expect this to be removed or altered unless you have an alternative motive for removing them.
I have explained this on O'Keeffe's page, can you explain your blatant vandalism on the Fianna Fail page. Wikipedia does not tolerate vandals. Snappy56 (talk) 13:11, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Please stop edit warring on Batt O'Keefe's article. See WP:3RR. Snappy56 (talk) 13:15, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you make anymore reverts to Batt O'Keefe's article you will be violating WP:3RR. This will be reported. Snappy56 (talk) 13:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule at Batt O'Keeffe. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|}} below. Tiptoety talk 16:36, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited an article, clearly referenced and without bias, and you are blocking me because a person with political affiliations has asked you to do so. This is censorship and you are being conned by Snappy56. Veritas-truth101 (talk) 16:53, 30 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have no political affiliations whatsoever, this more lies and innuendo directed at me. Please obey the 3RR in future and no more vandalism like this [1]. Please apologise for this vandalism, should you wish to continue editing on wikipedia. Snappy56 (talk) 00:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Go on Big Boy, make them say sorry. Make them obey. Discipline them. They need manners put on them and you are the Big Boy to do it. Ooops, forgot to sign. Batt O'Keeffe (talk) 13:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I also don't have any political affiliations whatsoever and have reverted the same things. If you are so sure that the statements are true then please prove a reliable source that has these statements in it. I have looked and they don't seem to exist. I think that with the statement regarding appologising is just a request to be WP:CIVIL--Pmedema (talk) 15:07, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]