User talk:VegetarianSatvic

January 2017[edit]

?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VegetarianSatvic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The editor had biased information at one point and only told some of the story, and not the full story of what happened. VegetarianSatvic (talk) 18:33, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have not addressed your actions in your unblock request. Please explain what you did wrong and how you will edit in a constructive manner in the future. —C.Fred (talk) 18:45, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

VegetarianSatvic, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

VegetarianSatvic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I will responsibly edit, by trying to put neutral information and collaborate with other editors, and have sources that are reliable, not India Today which is like a fashion website talking about religion, is that source really verifiable @C Fred. VegetarianSatvic (talk) 21:10, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address your edits such as this, or really even your edit-warring. Yamla (talk) 22:23, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hi VegetarianSatvic! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017[edit]

This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Marvellous Spider-Man 16:44, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Chinna Jeeyar, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 20:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

HELLO I FIXED THE CITATION PLEASE STOP CHANGING IT I WORKED SO HARD ON IT I WILL PROMISE TO CITE IT FROM NOW ON

Hello, VegetarianSatvic. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Chinna Jeeyar ‎, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 21:36, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Chinna Jeeyar has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:00, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Chinna Jeeyar, you may be blocked from editing. Do not remove independent sources and replace them with sources exclusively citing the subject's website. —C.Fred (talk) 22:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:04, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note the next time you attempt to turn the encyclopedia article into a fan page I will block you from editing. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:06, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 22:58, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 23:13, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Each user may have one and only one account[edit]

It looks like you just created Chinnajeeyar (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) in an attempt to edit that Chinna Jeeyar article.

There are some legitimate reasons to create multiple accounts, but attempting to avoid sanctions is considered abusive. If you were to create any other accounts to edit this article, the other account would be blocked indefinitely, and this account would be blocked for a longer duration.

The new account mentioned above was blocked for its username. —C.Fred (talk) 23:15, 15 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 21:40, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock-auto|2=Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "VegetarianSatvic". The reason given for VegetarianSatvic's block is: "Disruptive editing".|3=NeilN|4=7152652}}

Unblock-auto is not applicable; the account is directly blocked. —C.Fred (talk) 18:46, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

January 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Kautilya3. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Caste system in India seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not add opinions to Wikipedia, unless they are from recognised scholars. Even then they must be attributed. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:42, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:23, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked per this warning. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:26, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Chinna Jeeyar. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please do not remove information that is sourced without a good explanation; it looks like you're whitewashing the article by removing the information about his background. —C.Fred (talk) 23:41, 21 January 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

VegetarianSatvic (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17366 was submitted on Jan 21, 2017 23:56:07. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:56, 21 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@C Fred the information that was sourced should have been seen with other articles, you only tell some part of it, but not the other half of what is happening like saying he is an athiest but not adding the other information mI feel like you put biased information and I have even emailed wikepedia.Please let me add the other half of the information the full story not half in a neutral point of view cited. — Preceding unsigned comment added by VegetarianSatvic (talk • contribs) 18:31, 22 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NeilN ^{talk to me} 01:25, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]