User talk:Urvakan

Welcome[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! -- Davo88 (talk) 17:35, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

July 2010[edit]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. NativeForeigner ^Talk/_Contribs 18:43, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for extreme pointed disruption, edit warring, POV pushing agenda and extremely unacceptable and obvious racist editing, inserting racial slurs and making racist statements.. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 19:02, 14 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Urvakan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Vandalism? I explained each and every one of my edits, either on the edit summary, or the discussion page. I created my userpage, in the heat of the moment and now realize and regret making it. A more experienced user tricked me and than reported me. He is as guilty of extreme pointed disruption, edit warring, POV pushing agenda as much as I am.

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. Take responsibility for your own actions or expect to remain blocked. We take a very dim view of racism/ethnic hatred here. Beeblebrox (talk) 17:01, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Urvakan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I made the userpage comment in the heat of the moment and regret making it. As for the rest of the accusation, I would appreciate it if an experienced user could show me which of my edits were extreme WP:POINT, WP:3RR, and WP:NPOV and I will make sure not to break them in the future. The user who tricked me has been editing since 2004, that's 6 years to my 2 months. Don't you think I deserved a friendly warning that I was doing something wrong, before I was indefinitely blocked?

Decline reason:

What Beeblebrox said above. Stop trying to blame others for your own actions. Just because others may be wrong also does not excuse yourself from taking responsibility. —fetch ·comms 21:04, 15 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Urvakan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I had no idea I was doing something wrong, I based my edits and behavior on my interactions with Parishan and NovaSkola. I was not aware of the rules I was breaking. All I'm asking is some guidance. Do you really think blocking someone indefinitely without a single prior warning is fair?. It's like giving a jaywalker a life sentence.

Decline reason:

You got a warning. You had to have some idea you were doing something wrong. Even without it, you had to intuitively know you were doing something wrong. If you walk into a bar and start talking all provocative and trying to pick a fight like you did, you can't blame the bouncer when the next thing you feel after his hand on your shoulder is the street hitting your face. Maybe you want to behave. But from the looks of things and your first two requests, it looks like you came looking for trouble. And you found it alright. I'm not about to unblock someone who seems as reckless as you do. — Daniel Case (talk) 03:21, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion[edit]

I am also satisfied per WP:DUCK that you have evaded your block using User:67.81.190.76. I have blocked that IP for a month. Do not evade your block or you are less and less likely to ever be unblocked here. S.G.^(GH) _ping! 18:18, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's not my ip address. And I am not Hetoum I, someone already checked that. 01:24, 20 July 2010 (UTC)