User talk:Unit371

Welcome!

Hello, Unit371, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

ITunes Originals - David Gray[edit]

Why does the article titled ITunes Originals - David Gray actually talk about "Live from London EP"? Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:39, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article/title mixup is confusing. You should talk about that in the article, or they should have the same name. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:58, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I was coming across as pushy, I was just confused. :) Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 22:57, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Great, welcome, I hope you stick around. :) Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 01:18, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of ITunes Live from London - David Gray[edit]

I have nominated ITunes Live from London - David Gray, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Live from London - David Gray. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Dan Dank55 (push to talk) 02:43, 3 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

""""[edit]

Have you been looking at what has been happening to your articles? We do not create titles with "quote marks" around them. Now, please go carefully through your contributions and fix the incoming links to your articles.

As a separate issue, you may find that people dislike separate articles for each single - redirect to the album article to be on the safe side. For example, why did Not a Job repeat the whole track listing for the album. This is redundant info. — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 16:14, 4 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Emoticons (Ben & Jason album)[edit]

An article that you have been involved in editing, Emoticons (Ben & Jason album), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/reason: The article does not cite any references or external links, it contains few or no internal links and contains no information besides a track listing, which, in itself, is unverifiable. Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. HJ Mitchell (talk) 22:47, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Grounds for Divorce[edit]

A tag has been placed on Grounds for Divorce requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. OlYeller^Talktome 19:19, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of The Bones of You[edit]

A tag has been placed on The Bones of You requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. OlYeller^Talktome 19:22, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Leaders of the Free World (song)[edit]

I have nominated Leaders of the Free World (song), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leaders of the Free World (song). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:19, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Noisebox EP[edit]

The article The Noisebox EP has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Demo tape, not an official release. The article had no references.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Karst (talk) 22:37, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]