User talk:Tyler Matthews

Hexamethyl tungsten[edit]

Hi Tyler,

I've updated the images at WMe₆ as you suggested on my talk page.

Cheers

Ben 18:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent, thanks Ben!

Tyler Matthews 21:31, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Need help on linking to references[edit]

I have created an article, Hexamethyl tungsten, and have suggested to readers that if they would like further information to consult a particular reference in the references section. Right now, I just indicate the reference number manually (see the Molecular Geometry section of Hexamethyl tungsten). Obviously this will cause problems if I go ahead and insert additional references before the one I'm commenting on, as the reference number will shift. In addition, I like to make multiple references to the same source, and am currently doing so with the ¹ syntax. This too will break whenever new references are inserted. Is there a mechanism for linking to references in some manner other than using a number, say some internal comment or name that is unique? Is there are current standard way this is typically handled? How does one reference the same source multiple times without using the "ref" tag, resulting in duplicates? Tyler Matthews 04:33, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I think your looking for this reference to Footnotes.
<ref name="multiple"/>

will be the tag you should use everywhere you use the number 1. The name inside the quotes will link all references to the same footnote. Vice-versa, using a different word would allow several references to a separate footnote. exit2dos2000 04:50, 13 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Diana Hopper for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Diana Hopper is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diana Hopper until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 03:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Electric Hydrogen (December 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Electric Hydrogen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 22:59, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tyler Matthews! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 22:59, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]