User talk:Tspofford

Your submission at Articles for creation: William B. Spofford (bishop) (July 27)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by PotatoNinja was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:William B. Spofford (bishop) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

PotatoNinja^{(Talk to me!)} 07:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Tspofford, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! PotatoNinja^{(Talk to me!)} 07:23, 27 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: William B. Spofford (bishop) has been accepted[edit]

William B. Spofford (bishop), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Happy Squirrel (talk) 01:50, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A belated welcome![edit]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Tspofford. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Happy Squirrel (talk) 01:51, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Possible COI[edit]

Hello, I have re-reviewed and accepted your article. Congratulations! I noticed your username was similar to the article title. If you are related to Rev. Spofford, you should mention this on the article's talk page just to be above board. This is because family members often feel strongly about their relatives, which is great, but can affect how they react and write on Wikipedia. You can read wp:COI for more details. By the way, you did well to use the AfC process to allow others to comment on your work. Don't hesitate to ask me any questions. Happy editing! Happy Squirrel (talk) 01:55, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Navigation and internal communications[edit]

Because it's a Wiki, I guess, this is very different from the document management systems I've used in the past although I'm starting to grasp, more intuitively than anything, the general concept but I'm still more or less in the dark about how to have a dialog with another user or editor. For example, I have 3 messages from "happysquirrel" that I very much appreciate but I don't know how to respond. (I don't see a "response" or similar link. Can somebody give me (or point me to) some Wikipedia Talk for Dummies bullets? Tspofford (talk) 17:14, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:POTENTIALCOI[edit]

Yes, it's a potential conflict. I'm eldest son and de facto biographer (see http://spof.org). I was very cognizant of that as I wrote the article and omitted factual statements that, even though I know them to be true, I couldn't objectively document. Is this where I would/should have recorded the PCI?

Thanks for the cookies!!! Tspofford (talk) 17:20, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

elcome to Wikipedia Tspofford, from WikiProject Editor Retention
Thank you for registering! We hope that you find collaborative editing enjoyable. Wikipedia, an online encyclopedia that started in 2001, is free for all to use and edit within the guidelines and principles users have established and adhere to. Many of these principles and guidelines are listed below. Click on the link next to the images for more information. REMEMBER - each policy and/or guideline page has a discussion you can join to ask questions, add input and contribute your voice towards any current policy or guideline change underway! Join the discussion by going to the talkpage of the article. Please take a minute to view a number of quick start pages for an overview of how to work within these guidelines and more information to help you better understand the practices and procedures editors are using. These include: The Newcomers Manual and User:Persian Poet Gal/"How-To" Guide to Wikipedia. Sometimes new editors become frustrated quickly and find their experience on Wikipedia less than enjoyable. This need not be. If you are having a difficult time for any reason, please feel free to ask me for assistance! Or, better yet, visit The Teahouse where veteran editors are waiting to assist you.
	Policies, guidelines and peer assistance	Help and Tutorials
	The five pillars of Wikipedia. The fundamental principles of the project.	Tutorial. Step-by-step guide on how to edit.
	Main policies of Wikipedia. Wikipedia's main policies and guidelines.	How to start a page. If you want to create a new article
	Style Guide. The complete guide to how articles should look.	Help. The complete help guide
	Copyright. Addressing copyright concerns.	Quick reference. A handy quick reference guide for editing Wiki.
	Help Desk. Here you can ask other editors for assistance	Your user pages and your sandbox. Editing in your own "personal" space
	Adoption program. Request an experienced guide for your first steps of editing.	Frequently asked questions. Some common questions and their answers.

This is being posted on your Talk page where you can receive messages from other Wikipedians and discuss issues and respond to questions. At the end of each message you will see a signature left by the editor posting. This is done by signing with four ~~~~ or by pressing or in the editing interface tool box, located just above the editing window (when editing). Do not sign edits that you make in the articles themselves as those messages will be deleted, but only when using the article talkpage, yours or another editor's talkpage. If you have any questions or face any initial hurdles, feel free to contact me on my talk page and I will do what I can to assist or give you guidance.

Again, welcome! John from Idegon (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC) John from Idegon (talk) 17:36, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]