Jump to content

User talk:Troppmann

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

{{helpme}}

Do you have a problem you need help with? If so, please repost {{helpme}} here with an explanation of what help you need. Algebraist 03:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Troppmann, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -Will Beback 02:20, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


help Where's my article gone[edit]

It was probably deleted or moved Mark272 21:28, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article was deleted under the speedy deletion critera, you may like to review what wikipedia is not. You can place the {{helpme}} tag on your talk page and we will still notice it. Thanks --pgk(talk) 21:57, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
The specific reason listed for the deletion was:
  • Serves no purpose but to disparage subject; only external link is unreliable and similarly disparaging.
That appears more or less accurate. Please keep your contributions NPOV and verifiable. -Will Beback 22:01, 31 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy deletion of Big wow[edit]

A tag has been placed on Big wow requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jonathan 02:10, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


ok, lets try this again...

accoring to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:BAND#Criteria_for_musicians_and_ensembles

as far as i can see i have verified 1, 7, 9 and 10...in external links and more are coming....to verify more of the same.

also, the code hasnt been proofread, I hope it meets standards.

Image:Bigwow.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Bigwow.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 00:49, 25 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Bigwow.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Bigwow.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Kenosha Velodrome, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://kenoshavelodrome.com/About.aspx.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 19:31, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Actually, i have permission from the owners of http://kenoshavelodrome.com/About.aspx to use the content. I can provide that email is needed.

Would this be acceptable? Troppmann (talk)


Again, I have permission from the kenosha velodrome committee whats with all the cuts? How about READING this before doing the alterations?

Troppmann (talk)

Nomination of John Cline for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Cline is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Cline until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:39, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I have questions: 1) where is the discussion? 2) what guidelines has this article violated?

Would someone please explain? Thank you. Mickeywrangle (talk) 21:24, 25 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]