User talk:Tikkuy/Archive 1

Welcome!

Hello, Tikkuy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 20:25, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Chillin.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Chillin.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

June 2009

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Chillin (Wale song). While objective prose about products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Thank you. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:36, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, such as Chillin, you will be blocked from editing. You and your sockpuppet need to be blocked--Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:34, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

There is n't any information available to warranty the song an article. No third party coverage except for a music video. I myself (a Gaga fan) searched for notability but it fails hence redirected. I repeat donot change it back or this time it will be reported. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

WP:ANI discussion regarding you.

There is a dicussion at WP:ANI that involves you. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 11:47, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Hey! I just wanted to give my thanks for letting me know about the incident involving me on the administrator's noticeboard...Apparently, Legolas2186 didn't think I had the right to know, but I'm glad that you told me about it and let me stand up for myself. Thanks again! 121.44.166.7 (talk) 12:52, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Your welcome, but keep in mind that using multiple IP's in conjunction of your user account is considered sockpuppeteering. If you have a content dispute it is better to raise this at WP:DR then to continue reverting one another. Doing so will only increase the idea that a user is edit warring or trying to push a point. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 12:56, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know! I do try to remember to log in all the time, but to be honest I'm sort of new at using Wikipedia extensively and I'm still learning. I think a look at my contributions will show that I've never tried to push an agenda with my IP address. Thanks, though! Tikkuy (talk) 12:59, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Consider yourself warned then ;). The reason we have rules against it is because some people do not accidentally forget to login, but rather use their IP's as a means to evade blocks, warnings, edit wars and so on. I will add the above line to the ANI discussion to make sure you are not blocked on sight for sockpuppeteering. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 13:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

Chillin

I really donot care for your threats. Chillin has barely passed notability now, hence it can be kept at present. However if further improvements are not done, I will nominate it for deletion. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Please read WP:RS, WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:NOTABILITY to know what can be there in the article. You are continuously adding fancruft to the article there by making it less notable and more up for deletion. Stop doing this and start making constructive edits. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents

This is to inform you that there currently is a discussion about you at the WP:ANI. MS (Talk|Contributions) 11:42, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Chillin

Please be careful when reverting/undoing edits here. I understand you and Legolas are having a content dispute, but you have also reverted a few formatting changes I made, such as making sure the song title was in quotation marks and correcting date formatting per WP:DATE (i.e. "July 14" is correct, "July 14th" is not). I'm asking you and Legolas to please take the matter to the article's Talk Page so avoid edit warring and possible WP:3RR blocks. Thanks! - eo (talk) 12:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Tikkuy. I just reverted one of your change on this article. Actually per WP:RS DJBooth is not a reliable source which can be added, and youtube source which comes from an unofficial clip fails as it is copyright violation which Wikipedia doesnot allow. If you didnot understand what I said please feel free to contact me. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:40, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

No Tikkuy, I checked the site and WP:RS thoroughly, it really doesnot comply. And good for you for finding a valid reference to the Pop 100 for Chillin, although the mix tape info I commented out since it was outsourced. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:14, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I have yet to hear it. But I loved chillin, hope it becomes succesful too. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Actually, youtube links are generally not acceptable because they are unstable, any day MS can pull it off. Also at GA review, they are not accepted. You do want Chillin to go to GA don't you:) Aceshowbiz has been blacklisted so you won't be able to add it. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 14:45, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

(Outdent)I appreciate your feelings but one of the core policies of Wikipedia is WP:VERIFIABILITY which means everything that is added to an article in Wikipedia must be verified by reliable source, mind you, not truth but verified by whatever the reliable source is reporting. Hence any unsourced statement will be removed from an article. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 05:22, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi Tikkuy. I saw that you added unsourced material again in Chillin. Please stop this and read WP:VERIFIABILITY. Every thing in wikipedia needs to be properly sourced with reliable sources. I have your additions reverted in good faith again. Keep this in mind the next time. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

July 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for for edit warring at Chillin in spite of my warning at Wikipedia:ANI#User talk:Tikkuy. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.  Sandstein  13:06, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tikkuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I understand that there is an edit war being held on the Chillin page. However, I do not think that blocking the members of the edit war will help much as this is purely a content dispute that can only be resolved by coming to a mutual agreement about the content of the page. I think this could only be done if both Legolas2186 and I had access to each other's talk pages so that we can freely chat.

Decline reason:

When you edit war, you get blocked, that's just what happens. If you want to discuss the changes instead of edit warring, you should have done that before you were blocked. Closedmouth (talk) 14:22, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Re:Other Charted Songs

Not entirely. The discussion is still yet to be concluded. That is beside the purpose as why include content regarding chart positions of unreleased tracks in a section titled singles? If we were to include this content, a new section or sub section of some sort would have to be created. Problem is, there is not enough content to warrant an entire section. • вяαdcяochat 09:38, 12 July 2009 (UTC)