User talk:Tiger.chum

Welcome

Hello, Tiger.chum, and Welcome to Wikipedia!   

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents / Department directory

• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)
• The Signpost, our newspaper

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.
• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills without changing the mainspace, the Sandbox is for you.

Tiger.chum, good luck, and have fun. Aboutmovies (talk) 02:32, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

Mosman

Your edits are cool. I have no problem with different viewpoints; I welcome them.Alterrabe (talk) 16:58, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

I think you misunderstand McCarthy. You are right, what’s redacted can’t be proven either way. But that’s not the point McCarthy is making. He’s saying with all his years of decades of experience, he’s completely shocked that the dossier as a corpus of k owledge, (as opposed to the information inside perhaps), would even be mentioned, that that flies against all precedent. And that is, indeed, verifiable.Alterrabe (talk) 17:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)