User talk:This is me Jarvis

Welcome![edit]

Hi This is me Jarvis! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! SUN EYE 1 15:40, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Tabrez Ansari lynching—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 16:28, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Gaurav Chaudhary, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:34, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm DEFCON5. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Gorakhpur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. defcon5 (talk) 07:03, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please have some sense before removing someone's work directly. Wikipedia is not accepting article from the site I was providing , swarajya.com . Allow the website and then ask for "relevant sources". Bring back my changes nobody gave you the right to undo my work. Correct Wikipedia's data first This is me Jarvis (talk) 12:45, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Alt News. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 07:29, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Alt News, you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 10:08, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanctions Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

SUN EYE 1 15:39, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2021[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at OpIndia. —SpacemanSpiff 19:27, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at The Wire (India), you may be blocked from editing. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 18:44, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv🍁 13:26, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 07:28, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What is this? Please use preview, and write complete, verified sentences, lest you be blocked again. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 17:18, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Liluah Veteran (Eng. Med.) School, you may be blocked from editing. DanCherek (talk) 15:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Liluah Veteran (Eng. Med.) School (July 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheAafi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Schools are not inherently notable.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Liluah Veteran (Eng. Med.) School and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Liluah Veteran (Eng. Med.) School, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

─ The Aafī ^{^(talk)} 18:13, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SpacemanSpiff 19:59, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021[edit]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. JBL (talk) 11:28, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --JBL (talk) 11:37, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 12:13, 21 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Liluah Veteran (Eng. Med.) School[edit]

Hello, This is me Jarvis. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Liluah Veteran (Eng. Med.) School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:01, 20 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Liluah Veteran (Eng. Med.) School[edit]

Hello, This is me Jarvis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Liluah Veteran (Eng. Med.) School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]