User talk:TheRealFennShysa/Archive 7

Yes, I'm back...

Leave this place for months, come back and find it's still got the same petty squabbles going on between stubborn editors who can't admit when they're wrong - oh well. Get them blocked and move on... TheRealFennShysa (talk) 01:22, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit warring

Please look at my edit history and my contributions on the article before accusing me of messing with it. I did remove information an editor was sliding their argument on, but that's because it wasn't based on information that was cited and I couldn't find any citations for it. I cleaned up the epic film article with information I've added myself with citations and cleaned up URLs I've added there myself as early back as 2007 that were now dead. I don't know why me cleaning an article that has needed work and that people on WP:FILM have agreed needed work is considered vandalism. I'm trying to work towards a conclusion on an article while other people's counter arguments are just that i'm "trying to this" or "trying to sway that". Which is not the case. I'm trying to make things based on terms that exist. Andrzejbanas (talk) 11:19, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Star Trek: The Pepsi Generation

The article Star Trek: The Pepsi Generation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Insufficient third-party coverage to establish notability.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:02, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Star Trek: The Pepsi Generation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Star Trek: The Pepsi Generation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Star Trek: The Pepsi Generation (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:03, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stone Trek

The article Stone Trek has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable without substantial coverage in independent reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SummerPhD (talk) 21:34, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Stone Trek for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stone Trek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stone Trek (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SummerPhD (talk) 02:56, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

Photo of Babylon 5 press kit

Hey there - I saw you uploaded a photo from the Babylon 5 press kit from 1994. I'm trying to track down a copy of the kit for some research I'm doing, and you indicated that you have/had it. Any way we can talk? --Bepa (talk) 01:13, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Deathtongue.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Deathtongue.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

File:ZachPicture.jpg listed for deletion on Wikimedia Commons

An image or media file you uploaded or altered, ZachPicture.jpg, has been listed at Commons Deletion requests.

You can read and participate in the deletion discussion if you are interested or do not wish the file to be deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 17:02, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Raiders.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Raiders.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shizhao (talk) 00:32, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ClarenceBrown.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:ClarenceBrown.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:07, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

File:ChillyBilly.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:ChillyBilly.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. edtiorEهեইдအီးËეεઈדוארई電子ಇអ៊ី전자ഇī 01:43, 22 January 2016 (UTC)