User talk:TheHunter100

June 2019

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 02:22, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Removal of my edits

I gave a valid reason however if you'd like me to be more constructive I believe that it is a biased opinion and source and isn't factual so it should not be put on Wikipedia where people go to look for information and people will see that and automatically believe it as the truth which it isn't, it's a theory so I would like for it to be removed or at least have it said that it isn't factual but rather a political and/or social theory

Thank you TheHunter100 (talk) 03:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove information in articles that is cited by reliable sources like Variety and other well-respected newspapers and trade journals. Wikipedia relies on reliable sources to verify facts, not the opinions of editors on what is or isn't correct. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:31, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, as you did at Actor, you may be blocked from editing. General Ization ^Talk 22:24, 5 June 2019 (UTC)

TheHunter100, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TheHunter100! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Mz7 (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 6 June 2019 (UTC)