User talk:Tc2011

Edit to [[Militia (United States)

Your last edit to the above-referenced article appears to be broken. It looks like a closing tag was left out of one of the references, pushing too much of your addition into a quote in the list of footnotes. I'm not completely sure what it's supposed to look like so I hesitate to attempt a fix myself, but thought I'd bring it to your attention. PubliusFL (talk) 21:36, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. What's there is actually what I intended to put...but I also intended to go back to the section when I had more time to research reliable sources and spell out the "select milita" topic (which the second amendment article references). I included a large quotation within the ref to give others context, but I suppose I should have just put a blockquote in the section rather than leaving that monstrosity in the footnotes. I'll do that now. --tc2011 (talk) 21:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)

American Hunters and Shooters Association

Regarding your recent reversions to the page, the issue is not the content; the issue is the source. I have commented in detail on the Talk page regarding this matter.--E8 (talk) 15:29, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

• The source is verifiable, and as such, acceptable for use in Wikipedia articles. --tc2011 (talk) 23:52, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
  • You have repeatedly ignored / failed to address the discussion of this source. Please specifically refute the explanation why this material should remain on the page.--E8 (talk) 00:00, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Korean cuisine

The edits you added which I removed were not necessary as the text was already sourced from a secondary source, the tertiary web sources are not necessary and do not follow the academic source provided completely, at either rate they would just be redundant. The other edits were proper though.--Chef Tanner (talk) 20:21, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

• Fair enough. Thanks for the explanation. --tc2011 (talk) 22:19, 6 January 2009 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)