User talk:TVFan2012

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I like TV, Reading, Writing, Researching TV Shows. I also like the internet. I am BIG FAN of Te Today show. I hope to make Wikipedia a better place for Information.

October 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Natalie Morales with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 01:42, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Natalie Morales with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 02:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Natalie Morales with this edit, you may be blocked from editing.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 02:06, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Natalie Morales with this edit, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 02:08, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Natalie Morales. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:18, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Natalie joined in 2003, I keep giving you a Source!http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/3080436/ns/today/t/natalie-morales/ TVFan2012 (talk) 02:21, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/JoMontNW for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 02:24, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a sock of JoMontNW per WP:DUCK. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

  — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 02:48, 13 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]