User talk:T. Anthony

My archives[edit]

My link farm[edit]

My smaller link-farm.--T. Anthony (talk) 11:22, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting Google Books references[edit]

Please use Template:Cite books rather than direct links; you can paste them to [1] and get a nicely formatted link in seconds. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 20:36, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've been here for years and at times I feel I can't keep up with all the changes. Still I may do this in the future.--T. Anthony (talk) 21:54, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Off for Advent and now Lent[edit]

I tend to go off during the holidays, however this time I am again considering becoming permanently less active. Much of this is that in 2018 I intend to focus on self-improvement in the real world and work. And yet I admit that I am again having some moral difficulties with working at a site that is very biased in favor of certain positions that I have always opposed. I am being cautious in explaining what I mean as I do not want to start a fight, but one might be able to glean what I mean just by how I categorize my page. In the past I had learned to ignore this by just not working on politically or religiously sensitive issues, but maybe "complicit" being the word of the year this year is making me wonder if that is ultimately cowardice. Am I enabling something that I once said, and to an extent still feel, is a negative influence on the world? It is a conundrum. That said I am not going to make a blanket statement, as I once did, that I will never return. I probably will, but I might limit myself more to my own lists or just improving articles I have already made.--T. Anthony (talk) 02:40, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On consideration, yeah I'm going to work on my own lists or articles I've made when I return.--T. Anthony (talk) 05:30, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Now I'm off for Lent. Despite the above I may still start articles on Winter Paralympians.--T. Anthony (talk) 02:41, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Off for pretty much good[edit]

Done with Paralympians, so mostly intend to be gone until maybe 2020. I'll likely still edit my own red lists. Anyway so long!--T. Anthony (talk) 08:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Precious[edit]

begin biographies

Thank you for beginning hundreds of articles on personalities in literature, art, music, sports, politics, religion, such as Hannah Caroline Aase and Volker David Kirchner, some improved to high quality, such as Toyohara Kunichika and Diane Schuur, for the list of Catholic musicians, for service from 2005, - you are an awesome Wikipedian!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 11:37, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Two years ago, you were recipient no. 1960 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:14, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

2018 World Draughts Championship match[edit]

I wrote this article, but my English not good. May i ask you correct this little text. Thanks a lot. Bars 23 (talk) 15:54, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sort-of retired from Wikipedia, but I'll make an exception for draughts/checkers. Although I only did a bit of cleaning up this far.T. Anthony (talk) 16:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of child prodigies for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of child prodigies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of child prodigies (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ―Susmuffin ^Talk 15:52, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Darja Fedorovich[edit]

My article about Darja Fedorovich (a Belarusian draughts player which plays at 2019 Women's World Draughts Championship)) moved to Draft:Darja Fedorovich. How make it again an article? Help, please. Bars 23 (talk) 19:44, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I don't know. I don't see anything wrong with it offhand. Did the version that was an article have less sourcing than this? Is there a way you can find a source that covers things other than chess and draughts? Like did she receive coverage in a Russian or Belarusian newspaper?T. Anthony (talk) 23:26, 13 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Message[edit]

Nice to talk to you. You know? I am pretending to read Il Kantilena in a meeting of arab poetry. I would be very interested in quoting you, who edites the translation. Best wishes — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2800:21C1:C400:944:CD01:9ED2:4939:20E6 (talk) 13:00, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hah, I actually made articles on things I really know little about. I'd just look them up online. I can't speak or read Arabic.T. Anthony (talk) 16:15, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Article Susan DiBona[edit]

T. Anthony - sorry to disturb you, and I suspect that messages like mine might be irritating to the recipient, but I was looking at the article you created at Susan DiBona, and I come away questioning whether the subject meets the notability guideline. One of the three reference links is non-working, and another is a story about a local, hometown benefit concert fundraiser for a scholarship named after her father. I just don't think this one cuts it, but I would be delighted to be proven wrong (with more sources that establish notability)! - AppleBsTime (talk) 19:23, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Joseph H. Delaney[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joseph H. Delaney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.fantasticfiction.com/d/joseph-h-delaney/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Themillofkeytone (talk) 00:38, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Margot Kahl[edit]

The article Margot Kahl has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable individual failing WP:ANYBIO, WP:CREATIVE, and WP:GNG in their entireties.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheSandDoctor ^Talk 07:38, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Category:Disabled Wikipedians[edit]

I don't care what your opinion is, but I thought you might like to know about Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 November 8:#Category:Disabled Wikipedians and perhaps explain why you chose to join this category. Hyacinth (talk) 07:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Francesco Cafiso for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Francesco Cafiso is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Francesco Cafiso until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Rathfelder (talk) 23:40, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Francesco Cafiso[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Francesco Cafiso requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.francescocafisomusic.com/about. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Spiderone 09:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thomas Borino[edit]

The article Thomas Borino has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, and appears to have been that way since it was created in 2006. No evidence that he meets WP:MUSICBIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EddieHugh (talk) 21:58, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar

The Original! Its some years since I picked missing people from your list of Africans, Brazilians and missing women. When we renamed the 2015 Wikiproject XX to have a more inclusive name it was given the new name of Women in Red. A title of a page belonging to T.Anthony. You have been a continued contributor to the project ... and we restate here the attribution of the project's name to your page. Thank you. Victuallers (talk) 13:52, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of entertainers in Christian media[edit]

The article List of entertainers in Christian media has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Woefully incomplete list with no criteria of inclusion and is almost entirely unsourced

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:57, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of entertainers in Christian media for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of entertainers in Christian media is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of entertainers in Christian media until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:47, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of living silent film actors for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of living silent film actors is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of living silent film actors until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

pburka (talk) 13:22, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Oum Ramatou for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oum Ramatou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oum Ramatou until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Imcdc (talk) 04:09, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Umekichi for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Umekichi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Umekichi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

SL93 (talk) 20:40, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Christine Haidegger‎[edit]

On 6 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Christine Haidegger‎, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 18:40, 6 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Marjorie Tallchief[edit]

On 8 December 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Marjorie Tallchief, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. PFHLai (talk) 18:39, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Osteogenesis imperfecta[edit]

Hello—

Over a decade ago, primarily in the years between 2005 and 2010, you did a significant amount of work to the article osteogenesis imperfecta. I wanted to thank you for this work in the early years of the encyclopedia, when the work was much harder due to paucity of sources and poorly established policies on Wikipedia (as people were still figuring out what Wikipedia was and wasn't, and it was becoming the mature project it now is). I wanted to let you know that I rewrote significant portions of the article, cleaned up all {{cn}} tags, and it's currently under WP:GA review and will hopefully pass once reviewer Vaticidalprophet has time to work on it. (Certainly they are not the sole cause of how long it's been in GA queue, I took quite a while to reply to their first comment as well.) I have found it interesting how, unlike the majority of medical articles on Wikipedia, this OI article has been primarily moved forwards by sufferers of the disease, rather than able-bodied editors or medical experts. This is one of the only articles I know of where someone with a rare disease has donated their X-rays to the project, and I hope that becomes more common. I found your comments from 15 years ago interesting, such as I've only rarely heard of OI [patient]s with clinical depression, but this might be my lack of knowledge, but I have heard of OI [patient]s who are depressed because of isolation or pain., because I actually had a stay in psychiatric hospital followed by foster care primarily due to clinical depression, so, certainly your hunch was right that your experience was not universal. It seems my case is more severe than yours, which is also interesting as I think having both perspectives led to the balance we see in the article today. I am not sure if you will ever read this as you last edited in 2020, but thank you. Psiĥedelisto (talk • contribs) ^{please always ping!} 09:47, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Carolyn Cannon-Alfred for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carolyn Cannon-Alfred is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carolyn Cannon-Alfred until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 04:24, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amina Mama for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amina Mama is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amina Mama until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Reading Beans ^{Talk to the Beans?} 06:50, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:New Thought movement has been nominated for merging[edit]

Category:New Thought movement has been nominated for merging. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Storchy (talk) 08:55, 6 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of ancient Chinese for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of ancient Chinese is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of ancient Chinese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mucube (talk • contribs) 01:50, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Alan P. Peterson listed at AfD[edit]

An article you created, Alan P. Peterson, was listed at AfD here. Sending a personalized message because the new user who createdthe AfD did not transclude it properly, so you never received a message. Curbon7 (talk) 17:57, 17 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Bob Lenox for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bob Lenox is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bob Lenox until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Clarityfiend (talk) 03:45, 12 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lists of ancient Chinese for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lists of ancient Chinese is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lists of ancient Chinese until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Mucube (talk • contribs) 03:41, 21 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Larika Russell for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Larika Russell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Larika Russell until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:42, 29 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Joseph Matar for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joseph Matar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joseph Matar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

〜 Festucalex • talk 06:31, 4 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Phil Hawksworth for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Phil Hawksworth is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Hawksworth until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

zoglophie 11:13, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

abidasabr@oeouyory@BillliJuttgWelcome to Gboard clipboard, any text you copy will be saved here.[edit]

'

223.123.9.139 (talk) 05:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tap on a clip to paste it in the text box.[edit]

Snapchat filter and cell phone is blocked 223.123.9.139 (talk) 05:59, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Khady Hane[edit]

The article Khady Hane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lack of SIGCOV and other markers of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GraziePrego (talk) 04:34, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]