User talk:SynKobiety

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

User:SynKobiety

SK,

I dont know if you mind people writing on your talk page. I hope not.

I see you have looked into the CC vs. RC issue again. I also saw your comments on "George's" page. Thanks for your thoughtful attempt to get a WP administrator to look beyond his own Anglican bias. His and Jus Zis Guy's comment were deplorable as examples of intellect. This is depressing. As you know there are reasoned arguments to make--and they will not even look into them. It is truly truly bizarre. I am really beginning to wonder if WP is fundamentally broken.Vaquero100 01:52, 7 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

categories[edit]

Hello, I think votes regarding category renaming should be entered at WP:CFD Gimmetrow 02:14, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! -SynKobiety 02:36, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic churches[edit]

You said that there is only one Catholic Church. Please see Catholic Church (disambiguation). Osomec 10:07, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

When I look at Catholic Church (disambiguation), I see only one church named "Catholic Church." I also see several variations on that name, but only one with that precise name. SynKobiety 13:10, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NCOM - WP:CON - WP:NPOV[edit]

Thanks for your comments at Talk:Roman Catholic Church. But in a recent edit, mentioning WP:NCOM, WP:CON and WP:NPOV etc... you seem to have made a confusion between WP:NCON and WP:CON when typing near the end. Or maybe I am the one confused :-) Bye. --Leinad ¬ »saudações! 00:33, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank-you - I meant NCON and typed CON. -SynKobiety 00:49, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RFM[edit]

I began a Request for Mediation here [1] and listed you as a party. Please sign your name here [2] to agree to participate. Thanks. NancyHeise talk 06:26, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SynKobiety, can you please post your "agree" on this page [3] toward the bottom so it can be considered for mediation? Thanks! :) NancyHeise talk 19:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SynKobiety. When you have a minute, could you pop over to the above page and say whether you agree or disagree to the mediation proceeding? At the minute, we're just waiting for you and one more user. Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 23:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Request for mediation accepted[edit]

A Request for Mediation to which you were are a party has been accepted.
You can find more information on the case subpage, Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Roman Catholic Church.
For the Mediation Committee, Ryan Postlethwaite 21:41, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This message delivered by MediationBot, an automated bot account operated by the Mediation Committee to perform case management.
If you have questions about this bot, please contact the Mediation Committee directly.

Hi SynKobiety, I have made a motion to close the mediation for reasons described here [4]. Please come and post either your agreement or disagreement at the same link. Thanks. NancyHeise talk 17:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I presume that it was by mistake that your comment "Implies that RCC is more common and that CC is only used in official context" was inserted in connection with "The Roman Catholic Church, more usually called, both informally and in the Church's official usage, the Catholic Church", since the latter says just the opposite: namely that CC, not RCC, is the more usual name whether in informal speech or in official usage. Or to put it another way, that RCC is less common both in informal speech and in official usage. Soidi (talk) 17:53, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps it was meant as a comment, just above, on"The Roman Catholic Church - in normal official usage, the Catholic Church", where it does fit and where you have put exactly the same comment, but have not put your name as author of the comment. Soidi (talk) 18:02, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RCC mediation[edit]

A draft of the note under mediation is up for comments here [5]. Thanks, NancyHeise talk 11:16, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RCC Mediation[edit]

Your input is needed here [6] to decide on one of three options. Thanks, NancyHeise talk 03:19, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RCC mediation[edit]

Sorry to bother you again, we now have an option 4 to consider since no one could agree on 1,2 or 3. Can you please come vote again? [7] Thanks, NancyHeise talk 18:52, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roman Catholic Church mediation outcome[edit]

Hi, you are receiving this message because you were an original party to the mediation process regarding the Catholic Church name issue. The mediation outcome has been summarized and moved to the Catholic Church talk page here [8]. Please feel free to come join our discussion of the outcome taking place now before making the actual changes in the article. Thanks for your help and kind cooperation toward a mutually agreeable solution. NancyHeise talk 14:51, 13 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A comment here would be helpful. Soidi (talk) 14:35, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vote Re CC origins and historians differing POV's[edit]

Hello Synkobiety, sorry to bother you but we are having a vote on the Catholic Church page regarding whether or not to include the dispute among historians regarding the Church origins. Can you please come an give us your vote so we can come to consensus? Vote is taking place here [9] Thanks! NancyHeise talk 01:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Catholic Church[edit]

Hi SynKobiety, we are discussing the sex abuse paragraph here [10]. I am trying to get some past editors to come to the discussion so we can discover what others think. Thanks, NancyHeise talk 19:30, 1 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]