User talk:Swirlface

This user's face may be swirled beyond recognition. However, it is straightforward to reverse this transformation.

Banned users[edit]

Hi JPSwirlface, I see you have been tagging the userpages of a number of recently blocked users with {{banned}}. Technically these should be tagged as {{indefblocked}} since these users are indefinitely blocked, not banned. Thanks, Gwernol 00:54, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its not that big a deal, but its a nice detail to get right. Thanks, Gwernol 00:55, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Username change[edit]

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Allowing username change to Swirlface (talk · contribs). Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking.

Request handled by: Spartaz ^Humbug! 09:40, 5 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Roll back[edit]

Erm, why did you revert this? http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3ATiptoety&diff=196415507&oldid=196415349

Heh, guess I was being a bit trigger happy with the old RC patrolling. Sorry. Swirlface (talk) 00:40, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userpage[edit]

{{Helpme|Can someone sort out the text on my userpage? I'd like the image to appear aligned next to my userboxes, with the text completely underneath it. Thanks}}

Ta-da. Cheers, Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 01:21, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Username[edit]

I use the {{DISPLAYTITLE}} magic word, specifically {{DISPLAYTITLE:{{#if:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{NAMESPACE}}:|}}{{lcfirst:{{PAGENAME}}}}}}. Good looks on the name change, and I hope you continue to contribute constructively. east.718 at 03:57, March 7, 2008

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swirlface (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've just got back from an extended weekend (which was great btw) and have found myself blocked. If this has anything to do with my newly acquired username I am more than happy to change it again, should this one also be deemed offensive

Decline reason:

It seems you have actually been blocked for sockpuppetry. I'll ask the blocking admin to comment. - auburnpilot talk 01:31, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swirlface (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ah, I see this is a somewhat more serious allegation :( I do use a shared IP which has seen a few blocks as of late so I guess this sort of thing is unsurprising. I hope my contributions can convince you that I am nothing to do with this idiocy

Decline reason:

Per[1]. Please contact the arbcom if you wish to dispute the accuracy of Jpgordon's findings. MaxSem^{(Han shot first!)} 09:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swirlface (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

To be honest, I'm not even going to dispute the findings, as it's extremely likely that a sockpuppeteer is sharing my IP, given its illustrious history of editing. I am disputing that the said sockpuppeteer is me. More to the point, even if I do have to start again and create a new account, how can I be sure that I won't get caught up in this sort of thing again. Incidentally, how do I contact the arbcom now that I'm blocked? I'd prefer not to register an email address is possible (ie if someone could post a request on my behalf), but of course if there is no other way then I shall.

Decline reason:

Per Rlevse below, let's let ArbCom sort this out. -MBK₀₀₄ 11:44, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I'll contact the arbcom for you. — Rlevse • Talk • 11:09, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers, Swirlface (talk) 11:15, 11 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Swirlface (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Has anyone got in touch with the arbcom yet? If it's just a case of my being impatient, by all means ignore me! :)

Decline reason:

Question asked, question answered. Please contact an arbitrator directly to contest this block. You can find their contacts on WP:ARBCOM — Spartaz ^Humbug! 13:09, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes, I contacted them. They have not answered, which likely means they are not inclined to endorse unblocking you. — Rlevse • Talk • 12:45, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have personally emailed a request to Jimbo. Swirlface (talk) 15:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]