User talk:Sveinbjornpalsson

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at AfC Todd Terje was accepted[edit]

Todd Terje, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

SarahStierch (talk) 19:06, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Mercury (typeface), have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Ost (talk) 16:43, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking is generally inappropriate. Content should be fixed or replaced, but there is no need to remove an existing redirect until the replacement content is written. —Ost (talk) 16:47, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Also, apologies for the late welcome. I noticed your small number of edits, but had not noticed how long you had been around! —Ost (talk) 17:01, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi —Ost. I removed the reference to the typeface Mercury because (1) the typeface that the redirect links to is not the main typeface known by that name today. That honor goes to Hoefler & Frere-Jones' Mercury. That typeface has the distinction of having been added to the collection of MoMA, a rare honor for a typeface. The redirected Wikipedia page does not appear in the first three pages of a google search (just checked), which should speak to the relevance of the typeface under that name. The typeface that wikipedia now references is best known as Forelle. It has not merited it's own wikipedia page. I have extremely high trust in the editors of Fonts in Use, they are all named and known in type design circles as historians. Furthermore, no digital versions of Forelle have been published as "Mercury". I'm not really interested in doing a Mercury page, making new pages is so hard, I save it up for subjects I love. But that redirect isn't very helpful, I think it should go elsewhere, for instance to the Hoefler page.

Sveinbjornpalsson (talk) 19:33, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest that you nominate Mercury (typeface) at Redirects for Discussion with an explanation like you have above, to start a discussion about the appropriate target or need for the redirect. —Ost (talk) 19:45, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]