User talk:Surplu

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
User:Surplu
User talk:Surplu
Userpage
Talk


Talk page Guidelines
  • Please remain civil and polite
  • Please sign your posts using the four tildes (~~~~)
  • I will mostly reply here for continuity, but for big replies, I might reply on your talk.




Because of college, I may not be as active as usual, but all posts should be replied to easily within the same day. Sorry for any inconvenience

Welcome to my Talk page. If you wish to leave me a message, please do so at the bottom of the page, or by clicking on either the link above, or the little plus tab at the top of the page. Please sign your posts by adding four tildes to the end of the post, like this: ~~~~ Thank you. -- SurpluTalkToMe! 21:32, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Surplu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Cheers, Lights () 00:16, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RFA[edit]

Regarding your comments at your Request for Adminship, are you withdrawing? All the best, — Rudget speak.work 17:46, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I may? I apologize if I have wasted any of your time. I now realise that much more experience is needed to become an admin, which is understandable. Regards, SurpluTalkToMe! 17:49, 8 December 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Ah, that's alright. I know what RFA feels like. Make sure to take the opposition's comments into consideration, and come back with at least 3000 more edits, and you'll have a substantially increased chance of passing. All the best, — Rudget speak.work 17:57, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I admire you for trying, too! Deb (talk) 18:03, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i think...[edit]

...i am doing this right tidletidletidletidleSethiroth66 (talk) 23:33, 8 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image copyright problem with Image:GazLukeJon.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:GazLukeJon.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 07:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Considered vandalism[edit]

You know I think we got our edits crossed then. Wildthing61476 (talk) 13:55, 11 December 2007 (UTC) Actually I take that back, he was vandalising the GTA IV article changing the dates in the article...subtle, but sneaky vandalism. Wildthing61476 (talk) 13:57, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your VandalProof Application[edit]

Dear Surplu,

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof! Unfortunately, your application has been declined because it seems that you don't have at least 250 mainspace edits. When you fulfill this requirement, feel free to re-apply.

Snowolf How can I help? 23:34, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Random[edit]

This is my signature, SurpluTalkToMe! 11:07, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

previously unknown[edit]

The BBC article doesn't say that it's an unknown species; it says that it's a previously unknown species. That is, it was not known until this sample was discovered, and it is now known as a result of the discovery of a sample. Also, "Mindus harringtoni" is the name of the new species, not the name of the sample. --Delirium (talk) 21:56, 20 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback[edit]

Hi there Surplu, I saw your request for rollback on Doc Glasgow's talk page. He's not around anymore, but I looked at your contributions and you seem to be doing fine so I've granted you the tool. Good look with it, and don't forget to read Wikipedia:Rollback feature for informtation about what you should and shouldn't be doing with it. Take care, Ryan PostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 19:03, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Surplu.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Surplu.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jordan 1972 (talk) 14:05, 30 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This image was not used anywhere and Wikipedia does not host orphan images. You were notified of the impending deletion above and made no comment in the deletion discussion, so the image was deleted. -Nv8200p talk 01:39, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Patrol survey[edit]

New page patrol – Survey Invitation


Hello Surplu! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you  have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to  know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

  • If this invitation  also appears on other accounts you  may  have, please complete the  survey  once only. 
  • If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.


You are receiving this invitation because you  have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

File:MeandCairen.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:MeandCairen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 16:51, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:GazLukeJon.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:GazLukeJon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite[edit]

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 03:04, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers[edit]

Hi Surplu,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey[edit]

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

  1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
  2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
  3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
  4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
  5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, SteviethemanDelivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. This month The Women in Red World Contest is being held to try to produce new articles for as many countries worldwide and occupations as possible. There is over £3000 in prizes to win, including Amazon vouchers and paid subscriptions. Wikimedia UK is putting up £250 specifically for editors who produce the most quality new women bios for British women, with special consideration given to missing notable biographies from the Oxford Dictionary of Biography and Welsh Dictionary of Biography. If you're not interested in prize money yourself but are willing to participate independently this is also fine, but please add any articles created to the bottom of the main contest page even if not competing. Your participation in the contest and contributing articles on British women from your area or wherever would we much appreciated. Thanks.

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Notice

The file File:France05.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 2 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]