User talk:StaticGull/Archive 10

Archive 5

←

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

RE:Thanks![1]

• No worries :)--NAHID 17:32, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

--Mc14789 (talk) 17:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

sorry my brother got ahold of the keyboard its one of the cordless ones.....--Mc14789 (talk) 17:04, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi! No hard feelings :-). Happy editing! StaticGull  Talk  17:18, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

1933 page

what did i do to that page? nothing --: B (talk) 17:16, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi! You made this edit to the 1933 page, and were subsequently warned by CalendarWatcher. StaticGull  Talk  17:21, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Welcome, quite

Vandalfighting is a bit like standing on the bank of a very poluted river, plucking out the worst of the debris that is floating past, occasionally rescuing swimmers. ;0)~ I keep being shocked at the shear MASSIVENESS of the volume of vandalism. All the best! :) sinneed (talk) 19:56, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

:-D. StaticGull  Talk  16:04, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

My recent edit.

How would you delete a page if it consisted of a fictional history of a random person? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 216.100.88.208 (talk) 16:50, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi! You could request the deletion of such a page by placing {{db-g3}} at the top of said page, assuming that it's a blatent hoax. Make sure you're acquainted with the rules first, though. Happy editing! StaticGull  Talk  17:03, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Puzzled.

I am puzzled why my external link on the arts based training page is not acceptable. I am familiar with the organization that has two links there. What is the difference from their link and mine for Zoka? saulrabazz Saulrabazz (talk) 17:34, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing out those links. I've removed them and much of the content added with them per WP:COI and WP:NOTADVERTISING. --Ronz (talk) 18:03, 24 November 2008 (UTC)

Ronz has said it all :-). StaticGull  Talk  16:05, 25 November 2008 (UTC)

80.168.107.225 vandalism

Hi StaticGull, 80.168.107.225 has done it again. As you've been giving the warnings previously I thought you might like to take responsibility for the block. OrangeDog (talk) 14:50, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Hi! I've warned the anon-IP, and I'll make sure that further action is taken if he continues vandalising Wikipedia. Thanks for notifying me, and keep up the good work! StaticGull  Talk  15:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

No problem

No need to thank me. But I'm kind of new so I was not sure what I was doing, Thanks for letting me know that I had done it right!Firio (talk) 21:30, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

:-D. Keep up the good work! StaticGull  Talk  14:55, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you...

for this. :) Willking1979 (talk) 19:08, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

You're welcome :-D. StaticGull  Talk  15:31, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Removal of Exchanges under Mass Area Codes 339,351,413,508,617,857,978 Reversion of area code 351.

The list of exchanges that have been assigned per area code is severaly out of date. It would require daily maintenance on these sites since phone exchanges are issued and returned on a daily basis. My solution is to direct people to the following website for a complete and daily updated list of assigned exchanges.

http://www.nanpa.com/nas/public/assigned_code_query_step1.do?method=resetCodeQueryModel

Thanks

JWG. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jwg5333 (talk • contribs) 19:16, 5 March 2009 (UTC)

That sounds like a good idea. Keep up the good work :-)! StaticGull  Talk  15:34, 15 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:RICHARD listed at RfD

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Wikipedia:RICHARD. Since you had some involvement with the Wikipedia:RICHARD redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). –Black Falcon ^(Talk) 06:15, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fleur Agema

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Fleur Agema, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Has been unsourced for 3 months, fails the sourcing requirement at WP:BLP

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Kevin (talk) 11:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

m40a5

there is info in this months leatherneck magazine about an a5 model chamber in 300wsm and .338 laupa, any usmc recruiting office will have a free copy. write an article buddy —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.161.245.250 (talk) 03:52, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Matthew 7:7-8: .338 Lapua Magnum & .300 WSM. StaticGull  Talk  15:12, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Me

This is a public school computer, so it is better to ban this IP 69.92.95.145 (talk) 19:52, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi! Although IP-addresses should almost never be blocked indefinitely, you could try making an appeal here. StaticGull  Talk  15:17, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi-Diddly-Ho

hhhey —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.36.2.130 (talk) 17:37, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi there! StaticGull  Talk  16:13, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

carlisle

regret did not realise this had happened86.131.239.104 (talk) 08:12, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

That's okay ;-). StaticGull  Talk  20:48, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Read again

My change for Chaparral High School (Arizona) is not vandalism, please read the discussion page one more time, and read my justification. I am not the only user with this opinion. Editing warrants the lack of bias as a rule. If you agree, you can read again the section you just restored carefully. Listing every regional tournament result, with individuals and lower placing, for three consecutive years.

This is clearly biased. I am doing everyone a favor by eliminating the bias from the page, the encyclopedic ideal. However, from the first minute I have received nothing but abuse for trying to better the system, and somewhere a current student of this school is laughing because no one will stop him. DeltaEnforcer (talk) 22:13, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Hi! On further examinatinon, it is now clear to me that it wasn't vandalism :). Keep up the good work, but be on your guard for a conflict of interest. StaticGull  Talk  20:27, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Wrong person

Hi, you've got the wrong person. I didn't add the link to toprock500, I removed it :) Laurent (talk) 13:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi! Sorry about that :-S, I've removed the warning. Keep up the good work! StaticGull  Talk  13:29, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

No problem :)

Don't worry about it - I'm sure there's going to be a day someday where my userpage is vandalized and you revert it. Just being a part of the WikiPedia community :). --Addihockey ^(t/c) 04:41, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Sadly, there's a large chance that that will happen :). Keep up the good work!StaticGull  Talk  23:03, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks

for reporting that one person who added {{db}} tags to random pages.-- fetchcomms☛ 23:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

:-).StaticGull  Talk  23:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)