User talk:Stalwart111/Archive 21

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 15

←

Archive 19

Archive 20

Archive 21

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Title	Tagged with…
26	Cranbourne railway line (talk)	Add sources
37	Futuna (Wallis and Futuna) (talk)	Add sources
2	Pandav Rai (talk)	Add sources
17	Australian Council of Social Service (talk)	Add sources
877	Retinol (talk)	Add sources
180	Rydel Lynch (talk)	Add sources
814	Pradhan Mantri Kisan Samman Nidhi (talk)	Cleanup
29	Calder Highway (talk)	Cleanup
8	Thompson Road, Melbourne (talk)	Cleanup
18	League of the Rhine (talk)	Expand
1,172	Economic impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in India (talk)	Expand
6,640	Woke (talk)	Expand
304	Music of Bollywood (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
87	Armenia–Georgia relations (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
254	Hussain Muhammad Ershad (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
91	Vaccine Maitri (talk)	Merge
2,321	Scrum (software development) (talk)	Merge
824	Christmas Eve (talk)	Merge
55	Republican Party of Wisconsin (talk)	Wikify
7	Universal rule (talk)	Wikify
45	Piracy in the Atlantic World (talk)	Wikify
3	President's Cup Regatta (talk)	Orphan
2	Di Blueprint Band (talk)	Orphan
10	ShakeDeal (talk)	Orphan
39	Parma violet (talk)	Stub
4	Junction Village, Victoria (talk)	Stub
3	Lysterfield South, Victoria (talk)	Stub
2	Marie-Annick Dézert (talk)	Stub
6	Brian Fisher (biologist) (talk)	Stub
5	Cranbourne South, Victoria (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for your sagacious advice. Really appreciate it :) MaskedSinger (talk) 12:13, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

No problem. St★lwart¹¹¹ 12:16, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

I'm here for some more advice. I added sourced content to Miss Universe 2021 and it was reverted by 2 different editors. I posted to the talk page of both editors as well as the talk page of the page - no response by either of them. Frustrated, I reverted, the reversion and one posted on my talk page that I was making disruptive edits. So what to do? I don't know why I care so much about this edit. I guess it's the principle. That being, that if content is sourced it has a place on the site. And if others don't like it, tough. That's the rules of Wikipedia. Or am I wrong and completely out of line. MaskedSinger (talk) 04:59, 8 December 2021 (UTC)